Does anyone sell the entire range, or at least carry a catalogue with dimensions listed? I'm having a hard time keeping everything straight with all the jumping around...
Drew
Drew
Full Simpsons Range
- Thread starter Dpflaum
- Start date
It's complicated by the actual dimensions carried by individual vendors as well...the only thing you can be certain of are the handle sizes...just have a look at the emperor...three emails and I got three different lofts...I usually go between vintagebladesllc/emsplace/bullgoose/westcoast/classsicshaving/straightrazordesigns...sigh...yeah it just hit me what you meant about jumping around 
D
doleeo
Here you go Drew.
www.shoeboxshaveshop.com carries the whole line.
please someone put this in their sig immediately - Thread starter
- #7
I would, but I don't have a Polo
We have a ton of 'em and specifically mention that our measurements can't be relied upon to be comparable to anyone else's, but are certainly effective as relative comparisons between units within our site.
That's why we use the soda images for scale; works better than anything we can say.
That's why we use the soda images for scale; works better than anything we can say.
The soda can works pretty good for that, plus when there's more than one size to one of the brush lines all in a row helps a lot too. Ordered a Simpson Case here a few days back from you and looking forward to receiving it! 
Does anyone know where one can pick up the Rover? First time I've come across this brush and as I usually prefer Best, I love the handle the Rover offers. Oh, and does anyone know the measurements?
I remember, due to your enviable name
In a decade of retail writing before beginning our own business, one certainty was that manufacturer's published dimensions/weights of items were not reliable. We used to chuckle when we'd get emails from readers alerting us to our published 'mistakes' on specifications.
In a decade of retail writing before beginning our own business, one certainty was that manufacturer's published dimensions/weights of items were not reliable. We used to chuckle when we'd get emails from readers alerting us to our published 'mistakes' on specifications.
Similar threads
