Who uses a filtered pipe and what's your take on them? Any downside to using filters other than replacement costs? Do you have a preferred type of filter? Comments on the Savinelli balsa filters?
Funny that this topic came up now, I just today picked up my first pack of filters for a Lorenzetti pipe that I've been smoking for months without them. Been getting a lot of gurgle lately and wanted to see if they'd help. They are refined/activated charcoal filters that, according to the manufacturer, reduce tar and nicotine, which makes me think that they unfortunately filter out some flavour as well.
With my MM cobs, I've been using the little paper "filters" since day one as I like how they mop up all the moisture (which I believe is all they do, not much else is filtered out). I've had a few smokes without them and don't like how wide open the draw is. But regarding how they affect the flavour or taste of the tobacco, I don't notice any difference with or without them. And I'm a stickler about tobacco's flavour.
I have a few pipes that take filters and I do use them and like the result, it seems to take out some of the harshness, tar & moisture and I almost never get a gurgle with a filter pipe but I have been drying my tobacco much more lately with better results as well, I like the balsa wood filters a lot, I have one pipe that take the 9mm carbon filters but haven't really smoked it enough to form an opinion them yet.Funny that this topic came up now, I just today picked up my first pack of filters for a Lorenzetti pipe that I've been smoking for months without them. Been getting a lot of gurgle lately and wanted to see if they'd help. They are refined/activated charcoal filters that, according to the manufacturer, reduce tar and nicotine, which makes me think that they unfortunately filter out some flavour as well.
With my MM cobs, I've been using the little paper "filters" since day one as I like how they mop up all the moisture (which I believe is all they do, not much else is filtered out). I've had a few smokes without them and don't like how wide open the draw is. But regarding how they affect the flavour or taste of the tobacco, I don't notice any difference with or without them. And I'm a stickler about tobacco's flavour.
Those cardboard tubes suck IMO, try some Savinelli Balsa wood filters, they are much better.My two cobs are made to have filters. I keep switching back and forth when I smoke it, I can't decide if I like the filter or not.
Those cardboard tubes suck IMO, try some Savinelli Balsa wood filters, they are much better.
YesSo the balsa filters fit any pipe that uses a 6mm filter?
Those cardboard tubes suck IMO, try some Savinelli Balsa wood filters, they are much better.
Just reporting my first experience with a 9mm activated charcoal filter in my Lorenzetti pipe. I smoked Skiff Mixture (a blend I know well) twice yesterday, once without the filter and once with. The difference in taste was negligible... maybe a little smoother with the filter, if anything at all. The difference in moisture was dramatic. I usually use one or two pipe cleaners during my smoke to keep things dry and clean. With the filter in, it was as if I ran pipe cleaners through the stem multiple times throughout my smoke. Not a trace of gurgle or dampness. I even noticed a difference in temperature. I smoked it fast and hot (to the touch) but my mouth was surprisingly comfortable. Even with the best of smokes, my tongue gets a little worn out... not necessarily bitten, but just kinda "used" and I don't feel like smoking anymore until the next day. But with the filter in, my mouth was completely protected and I could have handled another bowl immediatelty after should I have wanted one. The only negative I experienced with the filter was a not unsubstantial restriction in draw. It was like pulling on a cigarette.... which actually is what I wanted when I first started smoking pipe months ago, but now it just feels all kinds of wrong. I could probably get used to it, though. I think the benefits ultimately outweight the problems.
I've read that, like the cardboard tubes, the balsa aren't true filters; they mostly only "filter" out moisture. If that's true, then what exactly are the benefits of the balsa compared to the paper tubes? In a nutshell, why don't the balsa wood filters suck like paper tubes?
I just feel they are more effective with better absorbency, I have tried both many times and IMO I get better performance from the balsa, what sounds better to you for smoking through, a processed paper tube with a plastic skin or a natural piece of porous wood? I too find the taste of (both smoke and filter) of the natural balsa better.Just reporting my first experience with a 9mm activated charcoal filter in my Lorenzetti pipe. I smoked Skiff Mixture (a blend I know well) twice yesterday, once without the filter and once with. The difference in taste was negligible... maybe a little smoother with the filter, if anything at all. The difference in moisture was dramatic. I usually use one or two pipe cleaners during my smoke to keep things dry and clean. With the filter in, it was as if I ran pipe cleaners through the stem multiple times throughout my smoke. Not a trace of gurgle or dampness. I even noticed a difference in temperature. I smoked it fast and hot (to the touch) but my mouth was surprisingly comfortable. Even with the best of smokes, my tongue gets a little worn out... not necessarily bitten, but just kinda "used" and I don't feel like smoking anymore until the next day. But with the filter in, my mouth was completely protected and I could have handled another bowl immediatelty after should I have wanted one. The only negative I experienced with the filter was a not unsubstantial restriction in draw. It was like pulling on a cigarette.... which actually is what I wanted when I first started smoking pipe months ago, but now it just feels all kinds of wrong. I could probably get used to it, though. I think the benefits ultimately outweight the problems.
I've read that, like the cardboard tubes, the balsa aren't true filters; they mostly only "filter" out moisture. If that's true, then what exactly are the benefits of the balsa compared to the paper tubes? In a nutshell, why don't the balsa wood filters suck like paper tubes?
what sounds better to you for smoking through, a processed paper tube with a plastic skin or a natural piece of porous wood?