As a veteran of the commercial food service industry in my youth, I salute you. No offense intended.As a former minimum wage teenaged "sandwich artist", I bite my thumb at you sir!
As a veteran of the commercial food service industry in my youth, I salute you. No offense intended.As a former minimum wage teenaged "sandwich artist", I bite my thumb at you sir!
Wisdom.I agree that 'hand tied' is an over used phrase as most brushes are hand tied. The most importamt question for me is 'hand tied by whom?'. Simpson brushes are hand tied by skilled craftspeople in my own country, who receive fair wages, working conditions, and benefits that I would want to receive myself. That costs money, and goes part of the way to explain the price of a Simpson brush, and it is why for me they are a bargain and why I am happy to own them.
Just for info, I'm bringing my truck in this morning for a boutique, small batch, artisan hand crafted oil change.
Funny, when adding the auto manufacturing hand tightening illustrative example to my above post the same thing popped into my mind as we would likely prefer robotic assembly that is done to consistent standards.Perhaps some brush manufacturer should make a virtue of their products being completely assembled by machine. "Absolute precision and consistency guaranreed...no Friday afternoon brushes from our hi-tech robots."
Yes as there is no observable automation in the Chinese factory process, it's all done by hand. A possible significant difference between a higher volume Chinese factory and a low volume custom manufacturer is the way the manual labor is divided up among workers/artisans. In the factory, and you can see this in the cosmetic brush factory video in my first post, process steps are divided among different workers who man the various production stations along the manufacturing and assembly line. Each worker does one or two things again and again.Oxford dictionary:
"a worker in a skilled trade, especially one that involves making things by hand"
Merriam Webster:
"a worker who practices a trade or handicraft, a skilled artisan"
Both also say this:
"a person or company that produces something (such as cheese or wine) in limited quantities often using traditional methods"
So, I guess this would apply to the factory worker in China who makes maybe $2 per hour, or a person who makes knots in Germany for a bigger company, who maybe makes $20 per hour; or a guy who makes small amounts of knots, guess his wages are probably in the $.50 area...
I always liked the term "the knots are handmade by .... craftsmen/women" (put Chinese or German, or American where the .... are), personally, I do not care for the term artisan as it is used for all kinds of stuff....from really good stuff (brushes, knives, knitted pullovers) to a bread/cheese maker. Craftsman/woman is what I prefer.
Have a look at the Chinese manufacturing process above, it supports the original post that almost everyone "hand ties" their knots. It's just an interim step to maintain the work-in-progress knot (after hair selection, packing and shaping) prior to the application of glue and any permanent mechanical attachment. The initial tie is removed from the final product.Which shaving brush makers hand-tie their own knots today? Varlet, Declaration Grooming, Wald, Mozingo, Turn N Shave, and a couple of others that aren’t generally available for sale? Do you guys know of any others?
As I understand it, the art of tieing a shaving brush knot involves hair selection, correct orientation (no black tips), packing the knot, and shaping it. Through this they can achieve a quality level and density of packing that gives the knot their desired characteristics - backbone, flow-through, softness, tip-feel. Then they set the knot into the handle to their preferred loft, which is also part of creating the knot’s characteristics. Since each batch of hair is different the brush maker should pack and set the knot to different specifications so that the knot works best for the hair.
Calling it ‘tieing’ is a bit misleading because tieing something around the assembled knot to hold it in place isn’t really the point. Neither is the fact that it is done by hand. The point is the selection of hair and the skill and care that goes into assembly of the hairs into a knot.
I’ve used three of the five brands I mentioned above who hand-tie knots in-house. I believe if you used a Wald or Mozingo badger brush, for example, you would easily recognise the difference that hand-tieing the knot with care and attention to detail makes. You should get a knot with uniformly white tips, you will feel the intended amount of backbone with very soft tips and zero scritch, and both of these brush makers use hair that does not gel at all. The knot will feel very different from a factory produced badger knot.
It definitely does come down to the skill of the knot maker, and their attention to quality and detail. Not all of the brands I mentioned are the same quality. But I think you can’t achieve the highest level of quality without hand-tieing the knot in-house.
That has been my experience anyway.
Yes. Aren’t we agreeing? I was responding more to other posts in this thread that seemed to be veering away from the point that ‘hand-tieing’ or ‘hand-assembly’ is a skilled task that definitely differentiates brushes, and that “artisan hand-tied” (or whatever we call it) means something important.Have a look at the Chinese manufacturing process above, it supports the original post that almost everyone "hand ties" their knots. It's just an interim step to maintain the work-in-progress knot (after hair selection, packing and shaping) prior to the application of glue and any permanent mechanical attachment. The initial tie is removed from the final product.
Hand tying is irrelevant to brush quality. You are correct that the other items such as hair type, quality, density, dimensions and the skill of the craftsman/worker in shaping and packing the knot are.
We both posted at almost the same time, see my post immediately above. Your view that "It definitely does come down to the skill of the knot maker, and their attention to quality and detail." is absolutely correct. It is consistent with my prior post that "the key differentiator between artisan and factory manufacturing is in the former a single highly skilled craftsman creates the product from start to finish while in the factory each worker only completes his or her small part of the manufacturing process. The craftsman or woman is focused on quality while the factory worker focused on quantity driven by labor standards."
Many are getting hung up on hand tying when the real differentiatior, in addition to materials, is between a factory workers focused on quantity versus an artisan who executes the end-to-end manufacturing process with a focus on quality.
Believe we are in agreement with the only difference being the way we are using some of the terms.Yes. Aren’t we agreeing? I was responding more to other posts in this thread that seemed to be veering away from the point that ‘hand-tieing’ or ‘hand-assembly’ is a skilled task that definitely differentiates brushes, and that “artisan hand-tied” (or whatever we call it) means something important.
Yeah. I used the term ‘hand-tied in-house’ as opposed to ‘hand-tied in a factory in China and shipped to the brush maker to glue into a handle’. The first one is what people really mean when they call a brush ‘hand-tied’. Anybody who calls a brush ‘hand-tied’ when they mean the latter is trying to misrepresent their product.Believe we are in agreement with the only difference being the way we are using some of the terms.
While most brushes appear to be made by hand and hand tied at one point in the process we are highlighting the difference between a brush made almost entirely by a single highly skilled craftsperson, focused on quality, versus one made (still by hand) by many workers on an assembly line where the focus is more on quantity. You are right that this means something important.