It's been a while since I shaved last time due to my varicela infection and today I finally made it 9th day of beard growth. I was kinda excited and in anticipation - what to use, how to attack 9 days beard? Fortunatelly I didn't have much of choice (that's why my RAD was kicking hard those days):
Must admit that I was thinking a lot of all the "wet-shaving hype" (spoiler alert: I might state very unpopular opinion but it's just my share of thoughts and would like to hear your opinion), all the variety of razors being available (yet vast majority falls in 0.68mm, 0.84mm blade gap), brushes (OK, I'm guilty on this one, but I guess one brush of a kind - boar, synth, badger is just fine), all the different razor-materials (SS, brass, zamak, bronze, aluminium, plastic etc.) and wonder - how did we get up here? Pure consumerism? Technological advantages? I still recall my grandfathers using no-name DE razors even without safety bar... my father still uses his own East-European brass razor... so do we really need all those new fancy stuff? Are there any real advantage, or at some point - it's just a collection thingy, hobby outside of the scope of daily routine and pure need to just "look presentable"?
While I lathered up, I was still in this mode - did I choose right razor? Should I have ordered another "beast" for days like this with double-digit beard growth but I still enjoyed my small-step improvement seen in Razorock BC brush. Nevertheless - I just started with R89, got my angle right (after 3 years I do it blind) and surprisingly - beard just started to fall off! OK, it's not uncommon - the longer the whiskers the more water they'll soak, easier to lather, easier to absorb lather -> hence easier to be cut, right? I finished standard WTG pass and performed cheek's XTG pass only. Needless to say - 9/10 (if BBS is 10). I was bit surprised, really.
R89 is a "mild" razor - but when referenced at reviews it almost sound like "not good enough", "beginners only", "short stubble shaver". Why we think about razors as "agressive = efficient", "mild - will require 12 passes and 2hr shave session"? Afterall it's the blade which performs cutting, everything else is just another piece of a puzzle. How well prepared is your face, how much of a blade wiggle is allowed by razor-head clamping, how nimble is the razor to swipe around face and maintain the ideal angle. I'd say that for my beard - whenever I though I'd need a "more agression" it ended up that my beard required incremental reduction to keep it comfortable, specially with thicker growth. With right soap-water ratio neither of my razors clogged with stubble, rinsed just as usual. I do sorry a little bit for not using Piccolo but it's already somewhat established as an efficient razor, so it wouldn't be such controversy for it as much as for a "mild razor".
Are we perhaps being pulled into the rabbit hole to acquire more and more razors, while mastering one (like our elders used to do) could easily achieve same result? Are we chasing the result, or we're just feeling adventurous about the journey? Are we just recreating that feel when we discovered the joy in wet-shaving, when we stopped having ingrown hairs and irritations of any kind? But - what if we don't achieve that any more? What if we're already at that point when further improvements would not be so remarkable (like when transition from cartridge to R/DE89 i.e.) and we end up dissapointed instead (i.e. "my 100$ razor shaves just a tad bit better than my 30$ one"). Not to mention that I could easily buy another R89 and R41 for the price of an average SS razor (+ some soap probably)
I was browsing for some razor in SS range, just for fun and I noticed that many of SS razors do have a bunch of complains but when looked at brass/zamak area of 20-30$ range there are almost >90% positive feedback Crazy, isn't it? I'm not saying that it's wrong to acquire another razor, or to have "each of it's kind", I'm quite pro-purchasing better creams/soaps/brushes as my mid-range soaps outlasted some of the cheaper ones, becoming super-economical (1$ soap would last 1 month, while 5$ soap is used for 8 months and still not a 5mm spent from tub), not to mention face-feel and skin care included when soaps with natural ingredient are used. So yeah, I'm supporting some investments in shaving gear, but as said - there are lot's of soap I'd use and I'm not even halfway through my current ones So what would happen with the razors? If zamak, brass razors would last us for a lifetime and already provide a great shave - do we need 3x more in price for a 5% improvement in shave feel?
Perhaps I've just did overthinking due to my overload of free time and too much reviews watched in a short time, but still - I couldn't resist from asking the question here. I'm not quite convinced by established YT-shavers, who use premium razors/soaps/brushes, worth of hundreds of $ yet still need 3-4 passes + touchups to shave nicely? Some of them even use lather so thick that it cracks on their face and later on suffer from tremendous aftershave-burn(!?) How's then top-tier products help in quality shaves anyhow
I'm like about 50$ in shave-equipment, enjoing remarkable shaves daily (and weekly) see no issues with OC or SB, and yet - I want something "new, durable, to last me a lifetime" you know, just a RAD thing I guess... But - is it really needed? Is it ok just to stop and enjoy the current place of the race, to admit - ok this is it, this works for me?
Please let me know what razor/equipment worked similar for you:
- Wilkinson Classic (black one) - for me agressive enough, but held blade almost horizontal, not very comfortable
- Muhle R89 - perfect balance in comfort and smoothness (but I use it daily and just a couple times made it on 5 days growth)
- Fatip Piccolo OC - little beast that would eat a much heavier growth
Must admit that I was thinking a lot of all the "wet-shaving hype" (spoiler alert: I might state very unpopular opinion but it's just my share of thoughts and would like to hear your opinion), all the variety of razors being available (yet vast majority falls in 0.68mm, 0.84mm blade gap), brushes (OK, I'm guilty on this one, but I guess one brush of a kind - boar, synth, badger is just fine), all the different razor-materials (SS, brass, zamak, bronze, aluminium, plastic etc.) and wonder - how did we get up here? Pure consumerism? Technological advantages? I still recall my grandfathers using no-name DE razors even without safety bar... my father still uses his own East-European brass razor... so do we really need all those new fancy stuff? Are there any real advantage, or at some point - it's just a collection thingy, hobby outside of the scope of daily routine and pure need to just "look presentable"?
While I lathered up, I was still in this mode - did I choose right razor? Should I have ordered another "beast" for days like this with double-digit beard growth but I still enjoyed my small-step improvement seen in Razorock BC brush. Nevertheless - I just started with R89, got my angle right (after 3 years I do it blind) and surprisingly - beard just started to fall off! OK, it's not uncommon - the longer the whiskers the more water they'll soak, easier to lather, easier to absorb lather -> hence easier to be cut, right? I finished standard WTG pass and performed cheek's XTG pass only. Needless to say - 9/10 (if BBS is 10). I was bit surprised, really.
R89 is a "mild" razor - but when referenced at reviews it almost sound like "not good enough", "beginners only", "short stubble shaver". Why we think about razors as "agressive = efficient", "mild - will require 12 passes and 2hr shave session"? Afterall it's the blade which performs cutting, everything else is just another piece of a puzzle. How well prepared is your face, how much of a blade wiggle is allowed by razor-head clamping, how nimble is the razor to swipe around face and maintain the ideal angle. I'd say that for my beard - whenever I though I'd need a "more agression" it ended up that my beard required incremental reduction to keep it comfortable, specially with thicker growth. With right soap-water ratio neither of my razors clogged with stubble, rinsed just as usual. I do sorry a little bit for not using Piccolo but it's already somewhat established as an efficient razor, so it wouldn't be such controversy for it as much as for a "mild razor".
Are we perhaps being pulled into the rabbit hole to acquire more and more razors, while mastering one (like our elders used to do) could easily achieve same result? Are we chasing the result, or we're just feeling adventurous about the journey? Are we just recreating that feel when we discovered the joy in wet-shaving, when we stopped having ingrown hairs and irritations of any kind? But - what if we don't achieve that any more? What if we're already at that point when further improvements would not be so remarkable (like when transition from cartridge to R/DE89 i.e.) and we end up dissapointed instead (i.e. "my 100$ razor shaves just a tad bit better than my 30$ one"). Not to mention that I could easily buy another R89 and R41 for the price of an average SS razor (+ some soap probably)
I was browsing for some razor in SS range, just for fun and I noticed that many of SS razors do have a bunch of complains but when looked at brass/zamak area of 20-30$ range there are almost >90% positive feedback Crazy, isn't it? I'm not saying that it's wrong to acquire another razor, or to have "each of it's kind", I'm quite pro-purchasing better creams/soaps/brushes as my mid-range soaps outlasted some of the cheaper ones, becoming super-economical (1$ soap would last 1 month, while 5$ soap is used for 8 months and still not a 5mm spent from tub), not to mention face-feel and skin care included when soaps with natural ingredient are used. So yeah, I'm supporting some investments in shaving gear, but as said - there are lot's of soap I'd use and I'm not even halfway through my current ones So what would happen with the razors? If zamak, brass razors would last us for a lifetime and already provide a great shave - do we need 3x more in price for a 5% improvement in shave feel?
Perhaps I've just did overthinking due to my overload of free time and too much reviews watched in a short time, but still - I couldn't resist from asking the question here. I'm not quite convinced by established YT-shavers, who use premium razors/soaps/brushes, worth of hundreds of $ yet still need 3-4 passes + touchups to shave nicely? Some of them even use lather so thick that it cracks on their face and later on suffer from tremendous aftershave-burn(!?) How's then top-tier products help in quality shaves anyhow
I'm like about 50$ in shave-equipment, enjoing remarkable shaves daily (and weekly) see no issues with OC or SB, and yet - I want something "new, durable, to last me a lifetime" you know, just a RAD thing I guess... But - is it really needed? Is it ok just to stop and enjoy the current place of the race, to admit - ok this is it, this works for me?
Please let me know what razor/equipment worked similar for you:
- cost low-mid money
- gave you expected results you could live with
- make you feel like you're ending your quest for a perfect shave
- something that you could settle on and never* buy anything more (unless needed or at super discount )
- what is your "I think I went over the line with this..." thing? (diminishing return)