What's new

Anyone familiar with this watch? experience?

I'm not familiar with it but I love my seiko and I'm liking the looks of it. If you end up getting it let us know how you like it.
 
Not familiar with it but i love my Seiko. I will say that the design of the face may make it hard to tell the time, kind of "busy" for easy reading. The picture of it on the site makes it hard to be sure the time. I like a cleaner face with more prominent hands. But then thirty years ago it wouldn't have been a problem.
 
I don't have that particular watch, but having had many chronos in my life, I will also say it looks a little hard to read to me. I agree with the comments of Captain Pre-Capsize above. The hands are too narrow for my taste, and they tend to get lost in the borders of the subdials. The solar is a nice touch for a chrono, as they do use batteries at a good pace if you run the timers a lot.

I never found a chrono as useful in practice as I thought it would be before I bought them. I seldom have a lot of things I need to time down to the second. If I do, my handy-dandy digital watch does the trick. For me, analog watches are better if they are normal 3-hand watches without a lot of bells and whistles.

YMMV, of course.
 
Thanks for the feedback gents. I do appreciate the comments on the difficulty to read...I hadn't thought that out.

Any suggestions on a Seiko, Citizen, or Bulova with a simpler face? I would like something over 40mm with some heft...

Thanks again.
 
I will say that the design of the face may make it hard to tell the time, kind of "busy" for easy reading.
Ugh. I was about to say how much I liked that watch. It has the most useful functions (date, stopwatch, alarm) without being overcrowded.
Then, as you say, they mess it up by putting unnecessary highlights around two dials, camouflaging the main hands! :facep:
If you want a chrono, I think this one is easier to read:
http://www.bluedial.com/ssc017.htm
Nice, but having a chrono limited to 60 minutes, plus a diver's rotating bezel is slightly redundant for most people, I expect.
 
My point is that a rotating bezel can be used as a 60 minute timer. So why have another timer (the chronograph) that is also limited to 60 minutes, and requires two extra dials?
Is the extra accuracy worth making the display less clear? To some people, but very few I bet.
 
Thanks for the feedback gents. I do appreciate the comments on the difficulty to read...I hadn't thought that out.

Any suggestions on a Seiko, Citizen, or Bulova with a simpler face? I would like something over 40mm with some heft...

Thanks again.


Here is my Seiko analogue quartz solar V157 diver's watch:

proxy.php
 
Ugh. I was about to say how much I liked that watch. It has the most useful functions (date, stopwatch, alarm) without being overcrowded.
Then, as you say, they mess it up by putting unnecessary highlights around two dials, camouflaging the main hands! :facep:
....
I have to agree, if the sub dials were not so bold or if the hands were bolder, the watch dial would work better.
 
Top Bottom