Ok, here is the strange question of the day. On vintage Gillette razors, the blade almost seems too big for the razor, and the "blade tabs" (I don't know the proper term for these) significantly hang off past the ends of the razor. These result in a significantly sharp edge that can cut into your nose if you are really sloppy, or just not at all paying attention.
I have several newer razors (a Lord Tech with the Merkur like head, and a Muhle R89), and these are designed differently so as to cover the entire blade, so these "blade tabs" don't hang out past the end of the razor.
So a question for the Vintage Gillette experts: Why in your estimation were the Vintage Gillette's designed in this manner?
Is there some benefit I am missing? Were blades shorter at some point in history? Is it just a result of the constant reworking of the DE blade?
I would consider this "feature" to be a flaw in the design.
I have several newer razors (a Lord Tech with the Merkur like head, and a Muhle R89), and these are designed differently so as to cover the entire blade, so these "blade tabs" don't hang out past the end of the razor.
So a question for the Vintage Gillette experts: Why in your estimation were the Vintage Gillette's designed in this manner?
Is there some benefit I am missing? Were blades shorter at some point in history? Is it just a result of the constant reworking of the DE blade?
I would consider this "feature" to be a flaw in the design.
Last edited: