Hey guys! Just posted a review I was working on this afternoon. Let me know what you think.
Thiers Issard Full Hollow 6/8 New Forging
Thiers Issard Full Hollow 6/8 New Forging
That looks like more of a 1/2 hollow than a full hollow. Is that just me or am I right?
Hey guys! Just posted a review I was working on this afternoon. Let me know what you think.
Thiers Issard Full Hollow 6/8 New Forging
Nice review, and someone actually likes TI scales.
Nice review, and someone actually likes TI scales.
People don't like TI scales??![]()
Great review, thanks for posting!
When you say that the blade "shaves just as well as an old W&B or Friodur" are you referring to how smooth the edge is?
That looks like more of a 1/2 hollow than a full hollow. Is that just me or am I right?
Calling it a full hollow is a big, big stretch, to say the least. Moreover, I checked Martin's description on www.rasurpur.de and I see that the razor is described as "Luxus-Einstiegsmesser", which means Luxury Entry-level Razor. If it is Full Hollow, it would have said "Vollhohles Messer". So, where did you get that it is full hollow? My guess is that it is 3/4 to full hollow.
At the end of the day, you can call your razors whatever you like, and I'll call mine whatever I like (even if no, it's probably not technically the proper term). If it makes you feel any better, according to this chart all of my razors are half hollow
![]()
For example, I use 1914 J.A. Henckels catalog chart to determine the hollowness of a straight razor blade. Your chart reflects what the Straight Razor Place [SRP] uses for hollowness designation. Their chart is widely accepted. Therefore, based on the SRP chart, I would agree that all your razors are half-hollow.
Yes, I'm one of those people. I had TI scales that were uneven in length. I know working with resins is difficult but that is unacceptable given the price of these razors. I replaced it with ebony wood scales.People don't like TI scales??![]()
There may be charts somewhere in the SRP wiki, but that does not mean they are the standard reference for all members of SRP. When you look at a razor and call the grind something, that is a subjective statement. Unless you have some precise tool to measure the width of the grind at various points and then match those measurements to some reference chart, it will always be subjective.
I can't tell you how many razors I have seen referred to as "wedges" here, on SRP, and elsewhere that have distinct bevels and hone wear at the spines. A wedge has flat faces. Razors with bands of wear, no matter how wide those bands are, are only wedge like. No reason to go and tell these people there razors are not wedges, they simply use a different word to describe what they are seeing.
Now it seems the same is happening at the hollow end of the spectrum. In my mind, the debate here is of no more use than the one on the wedge end of the grind spectrum. I mean really, if you can see photos of the grind, who cares what someone else calls it (so long as what they say is relatively close)?