- Thread starter
- #21
As others have said - these companies are profit driven. They know what generates complaints and what doesn't.
As far as violence vs language vs nudity, perhaps it's simply a matter of viewers recognizing that the blood and the decapitation is "make-believe", but the swearing and the nudity are real.
We know the guy didn't really get his head removed, but the exposure of breasts is an actual event.
None of the broadcasters would televise an actual decapitation.
Fair point, for adult viewers...and of course all parents are closely monitoring the viewing habits of their young children.