Below is my mileage; yours etc etc...
I have now compared the commonly available Gem storebought, the Gem PTFE, the Treet, the Blue Star and the Pal. My personal rankings, in best to worst order:
I'm not ranking on durability/how long a blade lasts since those are (to me) secondary issues...in my experience even the best blade is going to wear out within a half dozen or so shaves so I consider it negligible. If I had to guess, the average of the three that were worth trying more than once (that excludes the common Gem and Blue Star) is three decent shaves, then bury the soldier.
So eliminating the bottom two, the remaining three blades are in the same ballpark. Not identical, but similar. However, each has plus and minus to consider when looking to stock up:
IMO, Blue Star and Gem storeboughts aren't worth consideration as shave razors.
Overall, I give the nod to the Pal SE for its combination of decent cut and acceptable smoothness, combined with a very nice price per 100.
I would imagine the PTFE Gems would be second best buy, depending on how long the stainless holds the nice edge it comes with. However, if it holds its edge AND smoothness for, say, double the shaves of the Pal or Treet (others can tell me if it will or not, I do not know), that'd definitely alter the price equation and would cause me to possibly give it the top slot. More data is needed on that, though. Until then, I'll buy Pals when these 100 run out.
Views and opinions of other SE users welcome.
I have now compared the commonly available Gem storebought, the Gem PTFE, the Treet, the Blue Star and the Pal. My personal rankings, in best to worst order:
SHARPNESS:
Treet
PTFE Gem
[very closely followed by]
Pal
[big gap here]
Blue Star
Storebought Gem
SMOOTHNESS:
PTFE Gem
Pal
Treet
Storebought Gem
Blue Star
Treet
PTFE Gem
[very closely followed by]
Pal
[big gap here]
Blue Star
Storebought Gem
SMOOTHNESS:
PTFE Gem
Pal
Treet
Storebought Gem
Blue Star
I'm not ranking on durability/how long a blade lasts since those are (to me) secondary issues...in my experience even the best blade is going to wear out within a half dozen or so shaves so I consider it negligible. If I had to guess, the average of the three that were worth trying more than once (that excludes the common Gem and Blue Star) is three decent shaves, then bury the soldier.
So eliminating the bottom two, the remaining three blades are in the same ballpark. Not identical, but similar. However, each has plus and minus to consider when looking to stock up:
- Treets are the hands down sharpest, mowing through days worth of growth without hesitation. But being carbon, it probably won't hold that edge as long as some buyers would like. Sharpness also makes it a dangerous blade...you gotta pay attention when you load up with a Treet.
- The PTFE Gems are near DE smooth (no kidding, it's by far the most pleasant feeling SE shave of the five). And it does shave well. However, it appears to be a pricier blade.
- The carbon Pal is smoother than the Treet and not far behind the PTFE. But I don't think it's quite as sharp as either. The shave - while decent - takes more passes than either of the others to get you BBS. It'll do it, but it'll take longer. Also: since the Pal, too, is a carbon blade, having to make more passes per shave might not bode well for blade life.
IMO, Blue Star and Gem storeboughts aren't worth consideration as shave razors.
Overall, I give the nod to the Pal SE for its combination of decent cut and acceptable smoothness, combined with a very nice price per 100.
I would imagine the PTFE Gems would be second best buy, depending on how long the stainless holds the nice edge it comes with. However, if it holds its edge AND smoothness for, say, double the shaves of the Pal or Treet (others can tell me if it will or not, I do not know), that'd definitely alter the price equation and would cause me to possibly give it the top slot. More data is needed on that, though. Until then, I'll buy Pals when these 100 run out.
Views and opinions of other SE users welcome.
Last edited: