One of the most vitriolic arguments I ever saw at a shooting range was between two acquaintances when one stated that he was on prescription psychotropic meds. Needless to say, the whole room erupted and took sides on this delicate issue with one side saying that under no circumstance should anyone taking psychotropic meds have access to firearms and the other side stating that they should not lose their right to self defense. It was ugly.
Both sides have their respective points and to be frank IMO it should probably be on a case by case scenario, BUT it begs the question of whether the person taking the meds has the wherewithal to make that decision and if not then who?
Nice post