For the advancement of science! This is incredible stuff here Ken, I applaud you for this work..your really attempting to rationalize a generic term everyone who looks at brushes has come to take for granted and has become subjective to essentially using already assumed understood brush models 'chubby', '2xl' and 'other' This is still some complex stuff but your rationalization of the knot density is higher than most of us given that you've worked so hard with the group buy brush that you can come to those hard assumptions and proposed calculations.... working itself down to a simple end resulted number could even change the way manufacturers simply describe density down the road (just playing out what can result of this works and makes sense, as this is not a simple read I've read this in pieces to digest it)
But this thread has got me curious and interested!
kudos Ken for taking the step in really outlining this stuff out... maybe should take the moniker "Prof. ChiefBroom" haha..
But this thread has got me curious and interested!
kudos Ken for taking the step in really outlining this stuff out... maybe should take the moniker "Prof. ChiefBroom" haha..