Meanwhile, I really enjoy shaving with the Lupo - both aluminum and stainless.
What finish does your Wolfman have?OK...let the fun come to a conclusion...again!
Single Elimination Tournament....
Introducing the Competitors:
Rockwell
6C
$50
(Comfort 8/Efficiency 6)
Tatara
Masamune
$200
(Comfort 8/Efficiency 8)
Above The Tie
Windsor SSM-1
(Comfort 9, Efficiency 9)
$185
Feather
AS-D2
$175
(Comfort 7, Efficiency 8)
Karve
CB
$90
(Comfort 7.5, Efficiency 8.5)
Timeless Ti Polished
$300
(Comfort 9, Efficiency 9)
Timeless Ti .68 Smooth Matte
$250
(Comfort 10, Efficiency 9.9)
Timeless AL
$75
(Comfort 0, Efficiency N/A) Disqualified!
RazoRock Mamba .53
$65
(Comfort 9, Efficiency 8)
RazoRock BBS
$70
(Comfort 7, Efficiency 8)
RazoRock GameChanger .68
$65
(Comfort 9.5, Efficiency 9)
RazoRock Lupo .72
$70
(Comfort 4 , Efficiency 8)
Henson AL13-Mild
$70
(Comfort 9.5, Efficiency 9)
Henson AL13-Medium
$70
(Comfort 9.5, Efficiency 9.5)
Henson Ti22-Mild
$250
(Comfort 9.9, Efficiency 9.75)
Henson Ti22-Medium
$250
(Comfort 9.75, Efficiency 9.75)
Henson Ti22-Aggressive
$250
(Comfort 8, Efficiency 9.8)
Giesen and Forsthoff Timor ☹1353
$40
(Comfort 4, Efficiency 5)
Baili 176
$13.02
(Comfort 5, Efficiency 5)
Carbon CX-Ti .68 R2
$358
(Comfort 8, Efficiency 9.5)
Fatip Testina Gentile
$30
(Comfort 9...but Handle/Balance= , Efficiency 8)
Blackland
Blackbird Ti 🗡
$300
(Comfort 4, Efficiency 10)
King C. Gillette
$23
(Comfort 8, Efficiency 9)
Haircut & Shave Co.
Z074 Ti-5
$400
(Comfort 8, Efficiency 9.8)
Edwin Jagger
DE89
$40
(Comfort 8, Efficiency 8)
Mühle
R89
$45
(Comfort 6, Efficiency 7)
Wolfman
WR2 SS .95
$200 (Head)
(Comfort 9.9 WTG, 10.0 ATG!!, Efficiency 10)
Blackland
Vector Ti (Polished)
$390
(Comfort 9.8, Efficiency 10, Agility 10+)
The Wolf and the Vector are simply the best razors I've ever used, in terms of both smoothness and efficiency.
In the , James has allowed me for the first time to get a BBS with zero irritation.
In the , Shane has created a new paradigm. The razor feels like an extension of your hand...like I have a blade on the tip of my finger and I'm in complete control.
These two men are total geniuses who have taken all that has gone before them and brought it up to a whole new level...like the way Mozart learned everything from his teacher Haydn, and became the greatest composer ever. We are fortunate to be living in the era of classical razor artisans the way the 18th century was the era of Classical composers Beethoven/Mozart=James/Shane. Long after we're dead, gents will be paying a lot of money (a lot more money) for these razors.
New Top Three (Comfort):
1. Wolfman WR2 SS .95
2. Timeless Ti .68
3. Henson Ti Mild
N.B. These are the most comfortable razors. However, the best overall razors (in terms of comfort and efficiency) are:
1. Wolfman WR2 SS .95
1. Blackland Vector Ti
3. Timeless Ti .68
The Wolf and the Vector are tied for 1st place, even though they are radically different razors!
I got the cheapest finish (matte).What finish does your Wolfman have?
Also, what do you attribute the comfort to (blade angle, exposure, etc...)?
Nice pun.so I can't really give you a head-to-head comparison
I have extremely sensitive skin and only do one pass WTG because of it, and even then I can't shave for several days. I'm happy with a DFS, I just want to reduce the irritation for that single pass.Yes, RR handles should fit the Wolfman head. They're both standard thread size.
Henson, Timeless, and Wolfman are all very smooth WTG and XTG. What separates the WR2 from the rest of the pack is ATG. As I said, I have very sensitive skin. The Wolf is the only razor that allowed me BBS without irritation. If you have normal skin, that might not be an issue. Also, if you're only interested in DFS (which I was until I received my Wolfman), then any of these will get the job done!
The Mamba is also smooth, but it's been a while since I used it (or any RR), because I prefer lighter razors...so I can't really give you a head-to-head comparison. Once I tried Ti is was lights out for SS...and RazoRock certainly doesn't skimp with the amount of steel they use! That being said, many, if not most guys, around here enjoy the heft of steel...some even prefer heavier metals such as brass or copper!
I also have extremely sensitive skin.I have extremely sensitive skin and only do one pass WTG because of it, and even then I can't shave for several days. I'm happy with a DFS, I just want to reduce the irritation for that single pass.
But if they are all extremely similar WTG it may not be worth getting the Wolf nor Timeless. That's great to know!
Only slightly head heavy. The Wolf head doesn’t feel that heavy…and a lot of guys use their favorite Ti handles with it. I wouldn’t recommend any SS handle unless you really enjoy the extra heft. I’d rather have a lighter, slightly imbalanced setup as opposed to a perfectly balanced heavier one.Nice pun.
With the WR2, it sounds like you would have a head-heavy setup because the handle was Ti, correct?
I shave daily.You think the Mild can handle 7 days of growth of fairly dense stubble?
I ended up with the medium because I shave about once per week, but will likely pick up the mild during Black Friday.
Yeah, I think most razors do a pretty good job WTG…although even there you can tell a slight difference. Since your skin sounds even more sensitive than mine, you might be able to pick up more of a difference.I have extremely sensitive skin and only do one pass WTG because of it, and even then I can't shave for several days. I'm happy with a DFS, I just want to reduce the irritation for that single pass.
But if they are all extremely similar WTG it may not be worth getting the Wolf nor Timeless. That's great to know!
My own experience says no if you are going for one pass only. I have both the mild and medium, and I did a side-by-side comparison on 1.5 days growth where I did not repeat strokes or go over an area more than one time per pass. After the WTG pass, the mild left much more stubble. However, after 3 passes both mild side and medium side ended at the same DFS+ finish.You think the Mild can handle 7 days of growth of fairly dense stubble?
I ended up with the medium because I shave about once per week, but will likely pick up the mild during Black Friday.
I'll definitely look into it, thanks!Yeah, I think most razors do a pretty good job WTG…although even there you can tell a slight difference. Since your skin sounds even more sensitive than mine, you might be able to pick up more of a difference.
Although I use modern razors almost exclusively, there is one vintage razor that tops them all in terms of smoothness: the Gillette Aristocrat (4th Gen) Made in England As a bonus, it’s also the best-looking….
View attachment 1351991
If my skin was as sensitive as yours, I would try this And, yes, it can handle several days growth no problem
The only con is that it’s pricey!
And it has a short handle like most vintage razors
And it has a little heft.
Other than that, it’s the perfect razor
That's exactly the kind of info I need, thank you!My own experience says no if you are going for one pass only. I have both the mild and medium, and I did a side-by-side comparison on 1.5 days growth where I did not repeat strokes or go over an area more than one time per pass. After the WTG pass, the mild left much more stubble. However, after 3 passes both mild side and medium side ended at the same DFS+ finish.
The Mamba is great once you find and maintain the angle.I'll definitely look into it, thanks!
On a side note, I have high hopes for the Mamba 53: I saw a close up pic here of its extremely shallow blade angle of 16⁰ (the reason I bought it, along with your own rating here). That's half of Henson's 30⁰ and should make for a very different shave, with much less scraping and more of a cutting action. That's the theory at least...
I have the mamba 53 alsoI'll definitely look into it, thanks!
On a side note, I have high hopes for the Mamba 53: I saw a close up pic here of its extremely shallow blade angle of 16⁰ (the reason I bought it, along with your own rating here). That's half of Henson's 30⁰ and should make for a very different shave, with much less scraping and more of a cutting action. That's the theory at least...
Yes. More efficient than the 53.@Nehbulah Have you also tried the Mamba 70?