I change cars like I change underwear
Ah, Love my 93' 244 Volvo (5spd). It is my daily driver and frankly never lets me down.We bought a 245gt Volvo in 1980. Still drive it.
We bought a 745 turbo Volvo in 1985. Still drive it
We bought a Toyota long bed short cab 4x4 in 1988. Still drive it.
1988 was the last year we bought a new car.
Camry's are great cars. We purchased a new 2023 Camry last year and it's excellent. Close to last chance to acquire a standard ICE drive train vehicle with a regular automatic transmission (no turbo, CVT or hybrid) that gets around 30MPG in the city and high 30's on the highway. First car in over 35 years for us that is not a Honda. Chose it over the Honda due to similar mileage with a more proven drive train (Honda Accords now have a small displacement engine with a turbo) and much better looking interior.2017 Toyota Camry with about 47,000 miles on it.
Best car I've ever owned.
My stepson totaled my '08 Honda Civic and Mrs. Lockback insisted on an SUV so we ended up getting a new 2023 Toyota Corolla Cross, which is their small SUV. I like it a lot, although the interior seems a little cheap looking and it's underpowered. But it's comfortable and has a ton of nice electronics on it ... which hopefully won't go black someday when some electrons make a wrong turn.
The good news is that according to the latest Consumer Reports auto issue our Camry's are some of the most reliable cars out there. Your are right that cars have become more like computers on wheels and unfortunately most electronic devices are known more for planned early obsolescence versus long term reliability.Frankly, I even worry about Toyota. I did an in-depth deep dive on a lot of their cars a year ago when we bought our Corolla Cross and even Toyota seems to be leaning towards more complex stuff that could very well cause problems down the road. And their reliability seems to have dropped a bit, according to some sources. The number of sensors alone is staggering and few things are run by belts nowadays ... lots of electronics. I just don't have the faith in most modern vehicles; they've simply gotten too complex.
But, hey, I've been wrong before.
That is true for their vehicles with a classic ICE and multi-speed transmission.The planned obsolescence model was true back in the day, but I don't think it is today. The manufacturer matters, but the average lifespan for a Toyota vehicle is 200,000-250,000 miles. With proper care and maintenance, some Toyota models can last as long as 500,000 miles.
I suspect most cars can go 200,000 miles today, but probably the majority hit that mark with the second or third owner.
Yes, the CVTs have been out for over 10 years now and have proven to be reliable from most (not all) manufacturers when you look at published reliability statistics. No issues to-date on our 2014 Honda Accord with CVT as another anecdotal data point.There is quite a bit on the internet on this topic including from Consumer Reports, which seems to say that with the caveat, cars from reliable brands.
It is an interesting question, and the number of miles has surely gone up over the decades. For one thing, I do not think cars rust out the way they used to almost universally it seems. I suppose that lack of rust should be recognized as a great leap forward in car making. I guess I am surprised that a modern CVT transmission lasts that long.
Volvo used to advertise how long their cars lasted. I had a business partner who drove Volvos who argued that because they were more expensive than other cars folks were more willing to put money into them to repair them when they broke down, and that they really were not any longer lasting than other cars.
I do not know how this fits with our earlier discussion of how fast certain luxury cars depreciate.
I do not know firsthand but from what I have read, etc., even 100k miles on a Ferrari or Lambo is a highly unusual amount of miles.
For the most reliable cars (e.g Honda or Toyota) they depreciate a far slower rate than many others and retain significant value even when over 10-12 years old. Newer used cars (2-4 years old) are selling for almost as much as the same new vehicles.For the vast majority of people, me included, a car depreciates from the moment you buy it. I buy good used cars between 5 and 10 years old, and then look after them myself, by changing oil and filters. This is good for driving it for 100,000km or more and selling the car as a cheap trade in when it starts to cost money to fix. This has served me well to date. I must stress that I only drive petrol cars. Diesels in New Zealand are subject to road user charges, paid per kilometer which penalizes fuel efficient cars, especially when the price of diesel goes up. Used electric cars is a nightmare I don't want to explore, because of the risks associated with lithium batteries and cost of replacing them.
So does that mean you need to keep your cars longer or change your underwear more often?I change cars like I change underwear
I'll be curious to see if Toyota's CVT proves to be as reliable as Honda's. We have one in the Cross and while I'm not a fan of them overall, this one is decent, although the engine is a bit underpowered so the transmission gets wound up pretty good when you're entering a freeway.The good news is that according to the latest Consumer Reports auto issue our Camry's are some of the most reliable cars out there. Your are right that cars have become more like computers on wheels and unfortunately most electronic devices are known more for planned early obsolescence versus long term reliability.
Also the the newer drive trains, focused on efficiency, have yet to prove if they are as reliable for 200,000+ miles as the classic ICE/multi speed auto combinations. Honda and Toyota build their reputations for reliability on the classic drive trains. So far Honda has proven that it's CVTs are reliable. While the 1.5/turbo engines should be fine for the first 100-125K miles the jury is still out on whether they will be as bullet proof as the classic drive trains for 200+ miles.
My aunt gave me a '88 744 (I think that's the right number) GLE wagon some years ago. It was the best car I'd owned up to that point. Unfortunately an accident totaled the car. Interestingly I drove that car home after the accident. It sat in my driveway for a couple of weeks and I finally donated it. When the wrecker came to take it away I started it, (both headlights still working) and backed it out of the driveway to the wrecker. The radiator had been laid nearly flat from the accident.Ah, Love my 93' 244 Volvo (5spd). It is my daily driver and frankly never lets me down.
To answer OP question: We buy generally very used cars that have minimal tech/computers in them.
I do all my own work so I like cars I can work on without having to go through a dealership.
I admit that I have not actually looked at the reliability data. I pretty much unabashedly rely on what Scotty Kilmer says in his You Tube videos. I do not think he favors any CVT transmission, but will admit at this point that at least the Honda CVT and maybe the Toyota CVTs seem to be holding up pretty well. My impression they are very expensive and perhaps impossible to fix if they do break though. Not many around who can rebuild them competently, for instance.Yes, the CVTs have been out for over 10 years now and have proven to be reliable from most (not all) manufacturers when you look at published reliability statistics. No issues to-date on our 2014 Honda Accord with CVT as another anecdotal data point.
Mad props to you!Sitting here in the garage thinking about the original question....I have 6 vehicles I have had 25+ years. All in top shape and used regularly.
Toyota Tundra 2002, 316K miles.
But it's comfortable and has a ton of nice electronics on it ... which hopefully won't go black someday when some electrons make a wrong turn.
Repairs are often (always?) a part of the consideration when shopping for a car.
Like I said, last GM vehicle I’ll ever buy. I’m probably switching to Ford. I’m the last GM holdout in my family. Everyone else has switched to other manufacturers.
I agree that that is what they seem to do. It is amazing that all those companies can implicitly coordinate to do that, though. Most of the product has become less and less reliable. The exception would be Toyota. I would say that Toyota commands a premium in pricing because of it, too. I hear Mazda is getting much better.
Frankly, I even worry about Toyota. I did an in-depth deep dive on a lot of their cars a year ago when we bought our Corolla Cross and even Toyota seems to be leaning towards more complex stuff that could very well cause problems down the road.
I remember when Detroit vehicles came with a 5-numeral-wheel odometer. Yeah, nobody expected the car to make it much past 100,000 miles ... let alone for there to be any question about whether the numbers have rolled over more than once.the number of miles has surely gone up over the decades.
I dont understand where this post came from !! I did NOT make this post !!!!!!
I change cars like I change underwear
We’re now a blended family. My brother drives a ford, his wife drives a Toyota, and his son drives a Subaru. My mom was driving a Mazda when she passed, and my dad drives a Toyota. My wife (Buick) and I are the last GM drivers in the family.Growing up, our family was a Chev/GM family. I broke the tradition when I bought my first vehicle ... a Toyota. Then my brother followed suit buying a Toyota for his first car. Eventually my parents followed suit, and now we're a Toyota family.
Can’t turn cars inside out like you can undies.Four times a year whether you need to or not?
Can’t turn cars inside out like you can undies.