- Thread starter
- #1,881
I get all that but they just introduced the same AL13 handle in stainless. And it seems as you stated, that the handle would be the most complicated & expensive part of the razor because of it's intricacies. Might as well go forward and make the whole stainless razor! I mean they do offer the titanium which is very expensive and people still pay for it. I've read and read about countless people wanting a stainless one and they don't seem to budge!I am not a machinist, but I'd assume the more intricate a design and the more material needs to be removed, the more expensive the process is going to be.
Henson does interesting things with the way the lather channel is shaped, as well as the gentle curving of the top cap.
When Yates talked about the first Winning razor, they said the crummy lather channels were a cost saving measure.
Now that there is a single lather slot and more material removed from the head (and a few more curves) the razor costs double what it used to.
I have both the v1 and v2, and the handle on v1 was basically a sandblasted stick with a thread, and while v2 is more elaborate than that, it isn't actually particularly elaborate, and might just be turned on a lathe (though I'm not sure that it is).
If you look at the Henson handle, there's some a bit more interesting stuff going on, and all these details add up.
Of course, maybe Yates are better at programming their CNC machines, or there are some other factors involved.
I'm just saying that even though it seems simple, there's likely more than meets the eye and there are contributing unknowns.
I'm not saying to make a stainless Henson for $82 (like the Winning) but I'm sure they could build one and sell it for a price that people are willing to pay. Again, they've already done it with the titanium one.
It doesn't make sense!