What's new

Blade Chatter: What Is It and Is it Real?

  • A blade that sticks and then skips along your face when shaving. Possible for both DE and SE razors though most commonly mentioned as an issue for SE razors, especially when shaving against the grain (ATG) where this can cause a nasty cut. I've seen lots of mention of this definition both in recent on-line materials in shaving "how-to" documents that go back over 100 years.
  • A blade that flexes (or vibrates) during the shave. Have seen even more posts referencing this from many sources including B&B members that related it to shaving noise level to marketing materials for various razors touting superior blade clamping. I've even seen a patent that reference reduced blade chatter though it provides no proof or statistics.
Don't see why this has to be an either or question.

Is there a reason to arbitrarily split these two things? They seem like a spectrum of the same thing. If the blade flexes it can make noise, if it flexes too much, it can also bite you and give nicks. I have a lot more confidence in using my razors which provide a rigid blade edge. The only razor I do not feel secure with are my Super Speeds. I can shave with them, but they do not have the rigidity of most other razors in my den.
 
Is there a reason to arbitrarily split these two things? They seem like a spectrum of the same thing. If the blade flexes it can make noise, if it flexes too much, it can also bite you and give nicks. I have a lot more confidence in using my razors which provide a rigid blade edge. The only razor I do not feel secure with are my Super Speeds. I can shave with them, but they do not have the rigidity of most other razors in my den.
It's possible that these are part of the same spectrum for some razors. They are listed separately based on the way shavers have posted/talked about chatter over the years. Also, a number of the skipping chatter discussions refer to SE razors that are extremely rigid and don't flex yet can still skip across skin, especially when shaving ATG. Given this listing the two separate definitions is reasonable. Suspect that even a well clamped DE blade, with poor technique, could skip without flexing.
 
Hi, nicely summed up and this somewhat takes us back to my OP in this thread that there are two definitions of blade chatter out there including:

  • A blade that sticks and then skips along your face when shaving. Possible for both DE and SE razors though most commonly mentioned as an issue for SE razors, especially when shaving against the grain (ATG) where this can cause a nasty cut. I've seen lots of mention of this definition both in recent on-line materials in shaving "how-to" documents that go back over 100 years.
  • A blade that flexes (or vibrates) during the shave. Have seen even more posts referencing this from many sources including B&B members that related it to shaving noise level to marketing materials for various razors touting superior blade clamping. I've even seen a patent that reference reduced blade chatter though it provides no proof or statistics.
Don't see why this has to be an either or question. Both of these can be true though we may decide at some point to rename one of them. The first appears to be real and is periodically referenced over the years. Only happened to me once when I first returned to DE because I did not tighten my TTO razor correctly. I've old documents that warn against this when shaving with a SE blade ATG as another example.

The second one seems to be more based on perception of the sound heard while shaving. No real scientific proof and also an open question as to whether blade vibration/flexing helps or hurts shave quality. Modern shaving system cartridges are actually designed in many cases to flex (sometimes with tiny springs) to better match skin contours for example. Note that if there is sound then it has to be caused by some type of motion/vibration as this is what creates sound.

Part of why chatter has received a lot of attention is that many modern razor manufactures talk about reducing it as a benefit from superior blade clamping in their razors. One goal of this thread is to better understand how real this benefit is in delivering a better quality shave. I looked for some research related to this and really couldn't find any other than what I noted above on modern shaving systems. Without research we need to rely on perception and YMMV though this is not always accurate.

Definitely an interesting and worthwhile discussion.

Based on my own experience, I think blade chatter (the skipping over skin, drawing blood kind) depends on whisker characteristics as much as razor design. I only have issues with that kind of blade chatter where my thick whiskers lay flat against the skin.

Everywhere else on my face I could use practically anything with no issue. However, where the whiskers lay flat, I get ingrowns with a cart and blade chatter with any DE that doesn’t support the blade well.

I think there are a lot of folks who would never experience this kind of chatter with a DE because their whiskers aren’t thick or don’t lay flat against the skin. I’d love to hear @Blackland Razors thoughts on how whisker characteristics affect blade chatter of the skipping, cutting type.
 
Based on my own experience, I think blade chatter (the skipping over skin, drawing blood kind) depends on whisker characteristics as much as razor design. I only have issues with that kind of blade chatter where my thick whiskers lay flat against the skin.

Everywhere else on my face I could use practically anything with no issue. However, where the whiskers lay flat, I get ingrowns with a cart and blade chatter with any DE that doesn’t support the blade well.

I think there are a lot of folks who would never experience this kind of chatter with a DE because their whiskers aren’t thick or don’t lay flat against the skin. I’d love to hear @Blackland Razors thoughts on how whisker characteristics affect blade chatter of the skipping, cutting type.

I’m going off intuition and not anything quantitative, but I think it’s a glancing blow. Like chopping a log at an angle instead of 90 degrees is more likely for the axe to bounce off. There’s maybe a secondary effect that if the hair is not vertical, you have to cut through a wider cross-section which puts more force on the blade and might increase the prevalence of blade flex/chatter.

Again, that’s purely a guess so let’s not pretend that I’ve ever measured any of this.
 
Top Bottom