- Thread starter
- #221
Is Copper lighter than Steel?+1 vote for a vintage Windsor Copper - it already has the look!
I have the Steel SSM1 but it’s heavy
What about Titanium?
Is Copper lighter than Steel?+1 vote for a vintage Windsor Copper - it already has the look!
Is Copper lighter than Steel?
I have the Steel SSM1 but it’s heavy
What about Titanium?
Copper is heavier than steel.Is Copper lighter than Steel?
I have the Steel SSM1 but it’s heavy
What about Titanium?
That’s what I thought...although I would have guessed that the elemental density of copper would have been around 8,943 kg/m3 instead of 8,944 kg/m3!Copper is heavier than iron or steel - the density of elemental copper is 8,944 kg/m3, the average stainless alloy is slightly less than 8,000 kg/m3. I don't have a stainless Windsor, but as a practical comparison, the Calypso copper handle is 82.2g, and the Calypso stainless on ATT's site is listed as 73g. Elemental Titanium is a little over half the density of stainless steel - 4,250 kg/m3.
Ok -1 vote for CopperCopper is heavier than steel.
Have you tried the Mamba?I'd like to suggest the Game Changer .68
Mamba .53 is considerably milder.Just got a notification that Italian Barber has the RazoRock GameChanger .68-P back in stock. Is this a worthy contender for the Mild Razor competition? (I already have the Mamba .53 on the way.)
That’s what I thought...although I would have guessed that the elemental density of copper would have been around 8,943 kg/m3 instead of 8,944 kg/m3!
Ok -1 vote for Copper
(1 vote for Titanium)
Both are superb...just different feel!How is the Windsor under and around the nose? I already have the Tatara and love it! Maybe I’ll add another razor to my collection?
Actually, the answer is "it depends" - on who you ask and how they measure it. If you calculate the density from atomic weight, the answer is 8,960 kg/m3, at 293 degrees Kelvin, at sea level. That's not going to happen with real world meaurements with real world materials, so any "real" standard industrial measure is going to be - sort of - an average. So I'll give you 8,943 kg/m3 ( actually, a common number is 8,940). In short, a block of copper a yard plus wide is really, really heavy. Really.
I have the ATT SSM-1. How does it compare against your three in terms of performance (smoothness + efficiency)?I finally read this thread. Of the razors currently in production that were mentioned, I have the Wolfman SB SS 1.05, the ATT S-1, and the Feather AS-D2. Of the three the Feather is the mildest the Wolfman the most efficient and the best combination of smoothest and efficient hand down is the A-1.
Ok. Thanks!I don't have the SSM-1 so can't comment on that. I did have the ATT S-2 but prefer the S-1.
I get great results using a Nacet or Silver Blue with the GamechangerI ordered the GameChanger .68 for $65 (Priority Shipping). I figured why not. A lot of gents use this as their daily driver! Worst case scenario...I sell it on BST
I have both. Will keep them in mindI get great results using a Nacet or Silver Blue with the Gamechanger
I have had both the Mamba 53 and the Game Changer 68. I much prefer the Mamba 53. I found the GC no more efficient than the Mamba, but considerably harsher in terms of blade feel and chatter. I sold the GC but still have the Mamba. But neither will dethrone the Henson AL 13, I predict.Just got a notification that Italian Barber has the RazoRock GameChanger .68-P back in stock. Is this a worthy contender for the Mild Razor competition? (I already have the Mamba .53 on the way.)
Well, you've been right so far! Just wanted to try a few more "legends" while waiting for the Henson Ti to get restocked!I have had both the Mamba 53 and the Game Changer 68. I much prefer the Mamba 53. I found the GC no more efficient than the Mamba, but considerably harsher in terms of blade feel and chatter. I sold the GC but still have the Mamba. But neither will dethrone the Henson AL 13, I predict.