That suggests that when a natural brush sheds, the hairs are not being released whole from the glue, but rather are snapping off leaving the root of the hair still in the glue. I am not sure that is the case. However, surely poor quality glue or shoddy glueing would affect natural and synthetic fibres equally as their relative strength would be irrelevant. Very confusingnatural hairs are more susceptible to breaking.
That sounds more plausible to me than synthetic fibres simply being stronger.In my experience with badgers, boars, and synthetics, the synths do BY FAR less shedding than the natural hair brushes.
I wonder if the fact that they dry so thoroughly so quickly has something to do with their resistance to shedding; or, perhaps it would be better asked whether the propensity of natural hair to hold moisture and dry slowly has something to do with why the hairs shed? I suspect that there is a relation.
In my experience with badgers, boars, and synthetics, the synths do BY FAR less shedding than the natural hair brushes.
I wonder if the fact that they dry so thoroughly so quickly has something to do with their resistance to shedding; or, perhaps it would be better asked whether the propensity of natural hair to hold moisture and dry slowly has something to do with why the hairs shed? I suspect that there is a relation.
Natural hair is quite affected by the alkalinity of soap/creams (which will break down the hair), but synthetic fibers are not.@Rudy Vey often says that he encounters accumulated soap residue deep in the knots of brushes that are shedders. Does such accumulation ever occur in synthetic brushes? If not then why not? If it does then why does it not seem to cause the same shedding as with natural brushes? I never get any white cloud from my natural brushes, perhaps it is the soft water in my location.