What's new

What does BBS look like under a microscope? (before & after pics)

I've been playing around with a USB microscope to measure blade exposure on some of my razors. I thought it might be interesting to see what whiskers look like with 48hrs growth, and what it looks like right after a shave. This wasn't a perfect BBS shave, but it was pretty damn close. Also, it's probably not the exact same spot but its the same neighborhood on my chin. The razor used was a Lupo .95 SB loaded with a German Blue Israeli Red (German Personna Platinum Chrome 😋).

It might be interesting to see what a Mamba .53 shave looks like compared to a Lupo .95 SB next. At any rate, here is what it looks like under a microscope.

Before:
proxy.php


After:
proxy.php
 
I find the "before" pic interesting. It shows the angle that the whiskers were cut at with the previous shave. Was that WTG, XTG or ATG?

I thought that was interesting too. The prior shave was a 1.5 pass shave with a Feather Popular razor loaded with a Personna. The pass was North to South, it was largely WTG in that section of whiskers. I think it was tree-topping them.
 
Maybe it's just artifact, but the BBS pics kind of look like little sores. Makes me rethink that close shave mantra.
 
Neat pictures- thanks for sharing; shows a few things we likely all knew intuitively- our beards do not grow perfectly regular, pigmentation in hairs varies, the angle of cut from a safety razor DE, and it was an excellent shave. I think hair tips should be right at the skin line, otherwise you risk ingrown hair. Seems @Dovo1695 has a bit of curve to his whiskers- do you have straight or curly hair?

I bet it would be closer and the cuts more uniform......:eek2::straight:
Cartridge closer and more uniform? If so, we'd all likely be shaving that way :001_rolle
 
I think there are some Gillette research videos that show pre and post shaves w multi blades..... . They have great labs to study these things.....not empirical data.
 
Top Bottom