Last night while watching the world series there was a short break during the top of the 9th. The Fox news network, to keep the dialogue going, was mentioning some of the sponsors. They mentioned that Gillette was a sponsor of the series, and added the tag, "maker of the Fusion, dermatologist's #1 recommended razor for a smooth, close shave".
I wonder where they get off saying that? Having studied statistics I realize that even with a small number sampling you can make the numbers say what ever you want. So I'm sure Gillette didn't ask a very large number of dermatologist's for their opinion on the Fusion.
I do wonder though if they just pulled that tag line out of their bag of advertising trickery, and they expect people to think, "Hey, if Dr.'s say its good, then it must be". Or I wonder how much money those few dermatologist's were paid for their endorsement.
Sounds like snake oil sales to me, what do other members think?
Regards,
Paul

I wonder where they get off saying that? Having studied statistics I realize that even with a small number sampling you can make the numbers say what ever you want. So I'm sure Gillette didn't ask a very large number of dermatologist's for their opinion on the Fusion.
I do wonder though if they just pulled that tag line out of their bag of advertising trickery, and they expect people to think, "Hey, if Dr.'s say its good, then it must be". Or I wonder how much money those few dermatologist's were paid for their endorsement.
Sounds like snake oil sales to me, what do other members think?
Regards,
Paul


