Ok so the title is a little clickbaity but here me out with the disclaimer of course being ymmv...
I have always had a problem with my lower neck and also getting some nicks and ingrown hairs here and there which I never got from a cartridge razor. I happened to have a cartridge still in the medicine cabinet so used it last week as a comparison since I hadn't shave with one in over a year now. It actually provided a great shave with a 2 pass shave including getting somewhere around dfs to bbs even on the lower neck. This morning I was curious to compare the mechanics of it since the blades are recessed into the head and also looked to be thicker and not as sharp. By all accounts I should have gotten a rougher shave with more tugging potentially.
I held the cartridge and DE side by side and matched the angle and realized that for the Lupo to maintain the same angle I had to hold the handle at quite a steep angle. Now of course this is entirely razor dependent, and some designs won't even let you cut hair at angles outside their build but luckily the Lupo affords me the flexibility to experiment outside of what people say is the optimal shaving angle. I did a single pass wtg like I normally do, then lathered again and for my lower neck threw caution to the wind and grabbed the handle steep and then used quite a lot of pressure on my lower neck and got a closer shave there than ever going agt, and absolutely no irritation. If I follow most instructions and try to use a more shallow angle and very light pressure to allow the blade to efficiently cut the hair, I always feel the tugging and get irritation and bumps and rarely achieve beyond a socially acceptable shave on my lower neck. I understand I'm probably scraping the hair away vs cutting it away, but for whatever reason my skin and hair combined with this particular razor and blade responded with the best results I've achieved to date in over a year of DE shaving.
The test will be doing this multiple times vs the "n of 1" I'm currently working off, and to see if a closer shave increases ingrown hairs and irritation over time, but I feel hopeful I have cracked part of the code in my own unique case. I do find it interesting since the cartridge I was comparing against technically has a negative blade exposure and 6 tightly packed blades vs 1 and the Lupo is a single blade with positive exposure. But I have tried the Leaf razor with 3 blades and didn't get the same results, so something else is at play here I think. My working theory is it truly is a product of how my face responds to a blade angle more than exposure or skin exposure to the blade. My hair is curly, but not necessarily as coarse as some so the scraping actions might be able to still cut my hair whereas other people will truly be just doing a skin scrape and have more hair in tact after a pass.
I accept criticism of this since it (no pun intended) seems to go against the grain of popular advice, but will continue testing with my different blade gaps and adding a larger sample size to my experience. I suppose the real message or take home is that experimenting is healthy and that everybody's body and equipment are different so there is some universal advice to get people started, but anything after that boils down to the individual.
I have always had a problem with my lower neck and also getting some nicks and ingrown hairs here and there which I never got from a cartridge razor. I happened to have a cartridge still in the medicine cabinet so used it last week as a comparison since I hadn't shave with one in over a year now. It actually provided a great shave with a 2 pass shave including getting somewhere around dfs to bbs even on the lower neck. This morning I was curious to compare the mechanics of it since the blades are recessed into the head and also looked to be thicker and not as sharp. By all accounts I should have gotten a rougher shave with more tugging potentially.
I held the cartridge and DE side by side and matched the angle and realized that for the Lupo to maintain the same angle I had to hold the handle at quite a steep angle. Now of course this is entirely razor dependent, and some designs won't even let you cut hair at angles outside their build but luckily the Lupo affords me the flexibility to experiment outside of what people say is the optimal shaving angle. I did a single pass wtg like I normally do, then lathered again and for my lower neck threw caution to the wind and grabbed the handle steep and then used quite a lot of pressure on my lower neck and got a closer shave there than ever going agt, and absolutely no irritation. If I follow most instructions and try to use a more shallow angle and very light pressure to allow the blade to efficiently cut the hair, I always feel the tugging and get irritation and bumps and rarely achieve beyond a socially acceptable shave on my lower neck. I understand I'm probably scraping the hair away vs cutting it away, but for whatever reason my skin and hair combined with this particular razor and blade responded with the best results I've achieved to date in over a year of DE shaving.
The test will be doing this multiple times vs the "n of 1" I'm currently working off, and to see if a closer shave increases ingrown hairs and irritation over time, but I feel hopeful I have cracked part of the code in my own unique case. I do find it interesting since the cartridge I was comparing against technically has a negative blade exposure and 6 tightly packed blades vs 1 and the Lupo is a single blade with positive exposure. But I have tried the Leaf razor with 3 blades and didn't get the same results, so something else is at play here I think. My working theory is it truly is a product of how my face responds to a blade angle more than exposure or skin exposure to the blade. My hair is curly, but not necessarily as coarse as some so the scraping actions might be able to still cut my hair whereas other people will truly be just doing a skin scrape and have more hair in tact after a pass.
I accept criticism of this since it (no pun intended) seems to go against the grain of popular advice, but will continue testing with my different blade gaps and adding a larger sample size to my experience. I suppose the real message or take home is that experimenting is healthy and that everybody's body and equipment are different so there is some universal advice to get people started, but anything after that boils down to the individual.