If it's really an RAD flair up then you must buy and keep both. It's the disease. Feed the disease.
NT
NT
Id go with the Razorock because its stainless. FaTips are fine but most find them to be too mild.
Get both and sell the least favorite on the BST!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Yes, he must be. Usually people complain that they're too aggressive, especially the early ones.Fatips mild?? Surely you jest.
Version 2 has less exposure than the earlier version and no gap. Unless you are using unnecessary pressure it is not an aggressive feeling razor at all. Version 1 had more cap span and was a bit less rigid and more bladey for sure.Yes, he must be. Usually people complain that they're too aggressive, especially the early ones.
Oh, hell no......LOL!!!!!I know. We all should've stopped after our first Tech or Super Speed purchase.
Funny but true“Unnecessary Purchase Conundrum” pretty much defines this whole hobby.
Not at all. Theyre very mild. FaTips have very little blade gap. Really, the only things they have going for them is being open comb.Fatips mild?? Surely you jest.
I think it's the blade exposure, actually. I have a later model piccolo. Doesn't feel crazy aggressive but it's also not like a tech or a Merkur 34.Not at all. Theyre very mild. FaTips have very little blade gap. Really, the only things they have going for them is being open comb.
“Unnecessary Purchase Conundrum” also sound like a cool experimental rock group from the late 70s.
Unless you are using unnecessary pressure it is not an aggressive feeling razor at all.
Theyre very mild. FaTips have very little blade gap. Really, the only things they have going for them is being open comb.
Buy Fatip Piccolo and Grande Testina Gentile, both in Chrome. You will effectively have 3 different razors. Parts are interchangeable. Piccolo head on Grande handle = Grande Open Comb.
No, Fatips are not mild they are smooth compared to razors with gap which are rougher generally speaking. The Fatip also clamps the blade forward towards the end of the cap and plate making for a very rigid clamp. Most razors depend on spring action, bend of the blade, for rigidity with the clamp point further back on the baseplate than the cap which allows for chatter as baldes are thin. All of this combined make for a smoother razor in the Fatip without loss of efficiency. An aggressive razor, one that always feels prone to bite, is aggressive due to being poorly designed. A rigid clamped razor with gap like the Gillette NEW SC is a smoother razor to its sister the NEW LC because of clamping distance. Some say the LC is better because it is more aggressive. This is not true the SC is as efficient but it is smooth, not rough, like the LC due to the LC's lack of blade rigidity. The Gillette OLD Type is superior to both of them because it is blade rigid without gap like the Fatip, and is smoother and more efficient than both the LC and SC due to blade exposure. The Old Type proves gap is the enemy and a rigid blade exposure rules. The Gillette Techs are what would be called mild razors, not worth the powder to blow them up, even though the Post War is a rigid design.Not at all. Theyre very mild. FaTips have very little blade gap. Really, the only things they have going for them is being open comb.
jmudrick is right and Badgerstate36 is off base.I've never found my Grande aggressive, but I do use it aggressively. I've not used a more efficient DE. The only other razor I have used thats more efficient is the GEM MMOC.
I'd call it a mild shaver too, with the proper technique.
View attachment 954232
I've never found my Grande aggressive, but I do use it aggressively. I've not used a more efficient DE. The only other razor I have used thats more efficient is the GEM MMOC.
This is not true the SC is as efficient but it is smooth, not rough, like the LC due to the LC's lack of rigidity. The Gillette OLD Type is superior to both of them because it is blade rigid without gap like the Fatip, and is smoother and more efficient than both the LC and SC due to blade exposure. The Old Type proves gap is the enemy and rigid exposure rules.
I dont know about that. Ive a Boker rebranded FaTip and its pretty mild. Its a notch or 2 above a Weishi and you really have to watch your angle with it or else it wont shave close. YMMV, though.No, Fatips are not mild they are smooth compared to razors with gap which are rougher generally speaking. The Fatip also clamps the blade forward towards the end of the cap and plate making for a very rigid clamp. Most razors depend on spring action, bend of the blade, for rigidity with the clamp point further back on the baseplate than the cap which allows for chatter as baldes are thin. All of this combined make for a smoother razor in the Fatip without loss of efficiency. An aggressive razor, one that always feels prone to bite, is aggressive due to being poorly designed. A rigid clamped razor with gap like the Gillette NEW SC is a smoother razor to its sister the NEW LC because of clamping distance. Some say the LC is better because it is more aggressive. This is not true the SC is as efficient but it is smooth, not rough, like the LC due to the LC's lack of blade rigidity. The Gillette OLD Type is superior to both of them because it is blade rigid without gap like the Fatip, and is smoother and more efficient than both the LC and SC due to blade exposure. The Old Type proves gap is the enemy and a rigid blade exposure rules. The Gillette Techs are what would be called mild razors, not worth the powder to blow them up, even though the Post War is a rigid design.
Yup, the blade exposure comes from it being open comb. Thats the funny thing about it, a razor can be super mild but still not feel mild if it has more blade exposure.I think it's the blade exposure, actually. I have a later model piccolo. Doesn't feel crazy aggressive but it's also not like a tech or a Merkur 34.