- Thread starter
- #41
Ok so for todays off shaving post...I bring you Bond...James Bond. With those words Connery launched the Bond series into the stratosphere. There has never been such an iconic figure which has affected so much of the cinematic universe as...Bond. Everyone wanted to emulate Bond, from the ludicrous..Matt Helm, Flint to the excellent Harry Palmer of the Ipcress Files and Jason Bourne. They all owed Ian Fleming, who took the "hardboiled dick" to new and previously unthought of regions. He was an instant hit. Suave, debonair and deadly. A license to kill. That was new.
And the perfect choice...Sean Connery, a tall taciturn Scot who embodied what Fleming wrote. At first Fleming detested Connery, even going so far as to call him "that great lorry driver". After "Dr. No" Fleming was so impressed that he made Bonds parents Scottish.
Connery continued his Bond portrayal which also made him an international star. There were issues etc. As always.
Connery came to his final almost outing in "You Only Live Twice"
Then came Lazenby, an Aussie who was in retrospect, an excellent Bond...he just wasn't Connery. He even famously said "This never happened to the other fella". OHMSS was a great movie and Lazernby could've been Bond for the next multi-movie package...but received incredibly bad advice from an agent who said that Bond was a dying movie series etc. Poor George, if only he had listened to those who knew. Even he acknowledged his rather stupid decision.
Then it's Sean...again in "Diamonds Are For Ever" Good to see Connery again even if its not up to "From Russia With Love".
Then, for me, it's into the dark period where Bond becomes "humorous and a p***y". Moore who certainly has his admirers and fans is to me the worst Bond because he is so "unBond". Moore hated guns...ok, violence...so why are you Bond? He even dressed as a clown...fah krissake. The only time he showed Bondian ruthlessness was when he kicked the car containing Locque over the cliff in "For Your Eyes Only". And Moore was unhappy about that. Moore brought more humour than was needed and a lack of gravitas plus some truly silly plots. "MoonRaker" anyone?
With Connery you knew if he hit you it was gonna leave a mark...Moore, meh probably wouldn't hurt that much.
Then in the middle of the Moore period it's "Never Say Never Again" an enjoyable romp with Connery that reprises the "ThunderBall" script with a great villain.
Then it's on to Dalton who gave two of the more under appreciated Bonds. Great action, plots and maybe a bit less humour but that was actually a terrific reprieve. Both films were darker and more serious than the Moore outings...thankfully.
Now it's the Brosnan period who, I must admit I enjoyed even if some of the plotting was on the goofy side. Ghost cars? Goldeneye was a great show for Bosnans debut. Excellent action, plotting and characterizations. Especially by Dench. Could've done without JD Bakers character but oh well. Or a better actor.
Now it's' Daniel Craig who brought Casino Royale back into the proper Bond fold. A superb movie with Craig heading to the #2 slot of all-time best Bonds.
Dark, gritty and realistic a total overhaul of Bond and the entire series. Excellent. All Craigs movies were better than anything Moore did. Even "A Quantum off Solace" which was admittedly the weakest of the Craig bunch.
When Bond first came out I couldn't believe what I was seeing, at the age of 11, I was mesmerized by this character. The toys, the action figures, the Corgi facsimiles and on and on. Bond was right there with Beatlemania.
So now I have via gifting two of the Bond "dolls". One of Connery and the other of Dr.No. Plus a couple of die-cast models, one from the Danbury Mint of the 1964 DB5 Astin Martin. Which is from my dad for Xmas one year.
Then there's the James Bond Archives book which weighs about 13 lb. Then some cocktail shakers, the bullet shaker has the decals worn off. And some shooter glasses. There's more but you get the idea.
Probably my favourite series of movies except for the previously mentioned "Dark Period"
Not sure what the producers are going to do next but it could be/might be interesting.
Remember "Shaken...not stirred"
And the perfect choice...Sean Connery, a tall taciturn Scot who embodied what Fleming wrote. At first Fleming detested Connery, even going so far as to call him "that great lorry driver". After "Dr. No" Fleming was so impressed that he made Bonds parents Scottish.
Connery continued his Bond portrayal which also made him an international star. There were issues etc. As always.
Connery came to his final almost outing in "You Only Live Twice"
Then came Lazenby, an Aussie who was in retrospect, an excellent Bond...he just wasn't Connery. He even famously said "This never happened to the other fella". OHMSS was a great movie and Lazernby could've been Bond for the next multi-movie package...but received incredibly bad advice from an agent who said that Bond was a dying movie series etc. Poor George, if only he had listened to those who knew. Even he acknowledged his rather stupid decision.
Then it's Sean...again in "Diamonds Are For Ever" Good to see Connery again even if its not up to "From Russia With Love".
Then, for me, it's into the dark period where Bond becomes "humorous and a p***y". Moore who certainly has his admirers and fans is to me the worst Bond because he is so "unBond". Moore hated guns...ok, violence...so why are you Bond? He even dressed as a clown...fah krissake. The only time he showed Bondian ruthlessness was when he kicked the car containing Locque over the cliff in "For Your Eyes Only". And Moore was unhappy about that. Moore brought more humour than was needed and a lack of gravitas plus some truly silly plots. "MoonRaker" anyone?
With Connery you knew if he hit you it was gonna leave a mark...Moore, meh probably wouldn't hurt that much.
Then in the middle of the Moore period it's "Never Say Never Again" an enjoyable romp with Connery that reprises the "ThunderBall" script with a great villain.
Then it's on to Dalton who gave two of the more under appreciated Bonds. Great action, plots and maybe a bit less humour but that was actually a terrific reprieve. Both films were darker and more serious than the Moore outings...thankfully.
Now it's the Brosnan period who, I must admit I enjoyed even if some of the plotting was on the goofy side. Ghost cars? Goldeneye was a great show for Bosnans debut. Excellent action, plotting and characterizations. Especially by Dench. Could've done without JD Bakers character but oh well. Or a better actor.
Now it's' Daniel Craig who brought Casino Royale back into the proper Bond fold. A superb movie with Craig heading to the #2 slot of all-time best Bonds.
Dark, gritty and realistic a total overhaul of Bond and the entire series. Excellent. All Craigs movies were better than anything Moore did. Even "A Quantum off Solace" which was admittedly the weakest of the Craig bunch.
When Bond first came out I couldn't believe what I was seeing, at the age of 11, I was mesmerized by this character. The toys, the action figures, the Corgi facsimiles and on and on. Bond was right there with Beatlemania.
So now I have via gifting two of the Bond "dolls". One of Connery and the other of Dr.No. Plus a couple of die-cast models, one from the Danbury Mint of the 1964 DB5 Astin Martin. Which is from my dad for Xmas one year.
Then there's the James Bond Archives book which weighs about 13 lb. Then some cocktail shakers, the bullet shaker has the decals worn off. And some shooter glasses. There's more but you get the idea.
Probably my favourite series of movies except for the previously mentioned "Dark Period"
Not sure what the producers are going to do next but it could be/might be interesting.
Remember "Shaken...not stirred"