Been here for a while guys. Based in Scotland,
This is my first post only been using a straight razor for about 6 months used DE for ages, i have honed 4 razors and refreshed a few in the last 2 month with good results, even some friends have commented how my edges have satisfied them, I still have a lot to learn. but enjoy honing.
I am working on a vintage restoration circa late 1800's heart emblem Ford( Pitchford).which i have cleaned,polished and re scaled, the honing thats a nightmare, but willl get there badly bevelled razor, one side toe heel taking bevel other side centre bevellling toe heel hardly developing. Working on trying to use 1" of stone for sorting, If that does not work thouhgt i could chamfer an edge full depth of stone but this will marginallly reduce hone width. Rolling x stroke on Nawina just wont present full edge of razor to stone Anyway its a totally different question, I want to ask.
I have asked on a face book group the same question
Where after synthetic progression should i change to coticule( red over and over on unicot and dilucote on Barts site). Or synthetic progression To Thurinigan, 4k,6k 8k or higher? Is there any mileage in going Synthetic to cuticule to Thurinigan to finnish? Or end up much the same shaving result one being smoother the other a bit more crisp?
I have 1,3,5,8.12k Nawina, and a 12 to 15k miniog welsh slate, just want to learn and try coticule and Thurigan edges. Many Thanks.John.
This is my first post only been using a straight razor for about 6 months used DE for ages, i have honed 4 razors and refreshed a few in the last 2 month with good results, even some friends have commented how my edges have satisfied them, I still have a lot to learn. but enjoy honing.
I am working on a vintage restoration circa late 1800's heart emblem Ford( Pitchford).which i have cleaned,polished and re scaled, the honing thats a nightmare, but willl get there badly bevelled razor, one side toe heel taking bevel other side centre bevellling toe heel hardly developing. Working on trying to use 1" of stone for sorting, If that does not work thouhgt i could chamfer an edge full depth of stone but this will marginallly reduce hone width. Rolling x stroke on Nawina just wont present full edge of razor to stone Anyway its a totally different question, I want to ask.
I have asked on a face book group the same question
Where after synthetic progression should i change to coticule( red over and over on unicot and dilucote on Barts site). Or synthetic progression To Thurinigan, 4k,6k 8k or higher? Is there any mileage in going Synthetic to cuticule to Thurinigan to finnish? Or end up much the same shaving result one being smoother the other a bit more crisp?
I have 1,3,5,8.12k Nawina, and a 12 to 15k miniog welsh slate, just want to learn and try coticule and Thurigan edges. Many Thanks.John.