- Thread starter
- #21
That looks amazing!
<I was particularly pleased at how the fatty parts came out, which was my greatest concern with the ribeyes. The fat was soft and succulent (better than what usually comes off the grill or skillet, if I'm honest).>
That is what I like to hear! That was my experience with pork chops. The lean meat was juicy, soft, and supple, and the fat intermarried with it in a way that I do not think regular grilling or pan frying accomplishes. More on re-searing than on the first searing, though.
<I couldn't quite find a straight answer as to whether they needed to be in there for an hour or two hours>
I am finding that a lot in sous vide recipes. There is an interesting series on videos on You Tube where a guy compares side by side all sorts of sous vide preparations of various things, such as powdered garlic, minced garlic, roasted garlic; or just salt and pepper seasoning, raw onion and garlic, and herbs and butter. Butter in bag/no butter. I think also there is one on different cooking times. I think some of the results are surprising to the poster. Hard for me to remember what the results are. In any event, lots of the advice on sous vide seems all over the place! I would think thickness would make a different as to length of time, but maybe not.
I do think sous vide gives lots of room for variation with little impact on results.
<I was particularly pleased at how the fatty parts came out, which was my greatest concern with the ribeyes. The fat was soft and succulent (better than what usually comes off the grill or skillet, if I'm honest).>
That is what I like to hear! That was my experience with pork chops. The lean meat was juicy, soft, and supple, and the fat intermarried with it in a way that I do not think regular grilling or pan frying accomplishes. More on re-searing than on the first searing, though.
<I couldn't quite find a straight answer as to whether they needed to be in there for an hour or two hours>
I am finding that a lot in sous vide recipes. There is an interesting series on videos on You Tube where a guy compares side by side all sorts of sous vide preparations of various things, such as powdered garlic, minced garlic, roasted garlic; or just salt and pepper seasoning, raw onion and garlic, and herbs and butter. Butter in bag/no butter. I think also there is one on different cooking times. I think some of the results are surprising to the poster. Hard for me to remember what the results are. In any event, lots of the advice on sous vide seems all over the place! I would think thickness would make a different as to length of time, but maybe not.
I do think sous vide gives lots of room for variation with little impact on results.