I only get 3 shaves of both the SS and the SS. Looking at how cheap they are I don't care about their longevity. There is no modern blade that lasts more than 5 shaves with my beard. I have much more blades than I would need in my lifetime anyway.
Shark Blades Chrome vs. Stainless
- Thread starter cytus
- Start date
Likewise, I've found that the Super Stainless are both sharper and smoother than the Super Chrome, albeit I'm shaving my armpits and legs, since I'm a woman.
Sent from my SM-P610 using Tapatalk
As a Shark SS user I concur about SS being sharper than SC, but I may have to buy a sleeve of 100 SCs to check again 
I prefer the super chrome, for me they are smother then the SS, they my not be as sharp as the SS but sharp enough for me. I find the the SC's are compareable with my Astra SP or the German Wilkinson Sword
Tried SS today in my r41. It's actually a decent blade. I didn't think it's too dull, maybe a bit tuggy under the chin against the grain but even in the r41 it feels gentle and you don't really feel the blade, absolutely great for quick morning shaves. Compared to the Astra SP I used 2 days ago, it's a dream. If your beard is not coarse, it's a very very good blade. If it is, it's still very decent imo especially compared to Astra SP or Ladas.
People are different, their beards are different, lucky people get many shave out of a blade, call them LUCKY.
Having an extensive background in manufacturing, I gotta say your story makes no sense bro. Even if they ran both products on the exact same line, it would be at two totally different times and those two products would never come no where near each other, even when they were finished and wrapped and stacked on pallets they are going to have two different storage locations.
I mean unless an employee might of thought it was funny to slip a super stainless blade somewhere into the mix of thousands of super chrome..... But that would be a pretty lame practical joke.
But I guess not as lame as inventing a story just to claim having done a blind test of two blades that both come with pretty good reviews attached to them.
What might be even lamer than that is belittling fellow members on a first post.
I revisited the Shark Super Chrome, which I initially didn't like as much as the Super Stainless. To my surprise, the Super Chrome blades worked great for me. They were both sharp and smooth in my mildest razor, the Gillette Tech.
I have tried both Shark SS and Shark chrome for quite some time.
I found the Shark super stainless to be distinctly sharper and sharper, the chrome to be softer and gentler.
However these Sharks are not blades I would consider for a hundred blade purchase, for my skin Asco SS is definitely superior, I prefer more.
I found the Shark super stainless to be distinctly sharper and sharper, the chrome to be softer and gentler.
However these Sharks are not blades I would consider for a hundred blade purchase, for my skin Asco SS is definitely superior, I prefer more.
I managed to get my hands on some Shark Super Chromes blades; I liked them more than Shark Stainless Steel blades. (I also tried and liked Shark Platinums.)
Of course, with beards and skin types being so different, the rule of thumb for shaving is really "YMMV" or as we say in the US "Different strokes for different folks."
Of course, with beards and skin types being so different, the rule of thumb for shaving is really "YMMV" or as we say in the US "Different strokes for different folks."
Your story makes no sense bro.
