Trust me my life would be simpler and bank account healthier if I wasn't able to get a satisfactory BBS shave from all kinds of razors. It's a curse I tell ya
My memory is shot, all they actually said was "The subservience of the razor to the blade is reflected in this report..." They didn't say the razor didn't matter. In 1938 some of the blades were crap and none were stainless. Scans of that article are posted somewhere at the forum but I can't find the post. Here's the introductory paragraph,Consumer Reports recommended the Fiat 124 too (not hating on Fiat I owned three).
Gotta linky? I think the razor frame matters a lot in a DE, not necessarily in ultimate closeness but certainly it defines the journey.
I believe rigidity is key for going straight ATG, but has anyone tried the 1 pass ATG with the R41? The blade exposure is less than what I thought it would be, so maybe the uniformity of the top cap would provide enough support?
The base plate design and how the blade is supported is essentially the same as the typical EJ/Merkur type head. The R41 has a hybrid safety bar and more exposure, but its the same basic design.
"It's aggressive, in terms of doing damage, but the efficiency is not commensurate with its aggression in my opinion."
That is exactly it. Thats how 'aggressive' is defined in my mind. An efficient razor isnt necessarily aggressive and an 'aggressive' razor isnt necessarily efficient. Either, can be used aggressively. I use all of my razors aggressively, but none are 'aggressive' razors.
In my opinion, floppy blades are what makes a razor act aggressively. One thing the Fatip family are not.
My R41 is far from precisely made too. It might have thick, pretty plating, but that hides a lot of flaws.
Notice the amount of flex thats only at the outside of the razors head. The blade is tight against the center 4 teeth.
The center of the base plate is bowed outwards.
Neither side of the base plate is straight and/or square.
The top of the base plate, where the blade sits, isnt flat and will rock side to side on that straight edge!
That says it all for me. By comparison, my Grande is a finely machined work of art.
I don't think anyone is besmerching anything. I think some are just expressing a preference for "rigid designs"...
Consumer Reports came to the conclusion in 1939 that the razor didn't much matter, it's the blade.
Muhle R41 first shave.
I've already made a post about this razor head @Raven Koenes was kind enough to send me so I wont go back over what I've covered below.
R41, Common Bar handle - Derby Extra.
Stirling Island Man.
Maggard synthetic.
49 hours since last shave.
Starting with the typical 3 pass shave, first pass N-S WTG/XTG. Second pass S-N XTG/ATG. Third pass and all cleanups done directly ATG.
Like I said in my first shave with my Grande and a Derby Extra, as soon as the razor moved I knew.
It tugged, considerably. No effortless full length strokes on this first pass. Two strokes over my cheek to my jawline and 4 strokes from my jawline to the base of my neck. Interestingly, as soon as the blade encountered my swirls, it skipped right over them, even leaving lather in the stubble. An adjustment in technique solved that however. I went a little shallower and increased the pressure considerably. That ended the skipping and minimized the tugging.
Rigidity doesnt make a shave more effective? I very much disagree.
Second pass S-N and still some very light tugging but not an issue and honestly, smooth sailing. Comfortable and easy. I buffed around my chin the same as always, a little over my swirls and even changed direction, painting lather with the comb and shaved over both swirls the opposite direction keeping to a shallow angle. No issues.
Third pass directly ATG, angle leaning more to neutral and steep than shallow now. Again no issues, nice smooth easy shave, very light buffing over my jawline both sides and my swirls again.
Wipe and check and not quite there yet, so I did one more clean up pass and finished with a very nice and comfortable BBS shave. No irritation or redness at all and my skin is cool and comfortable.
Now I'll say, Derby Extra is not a good match in this razor and using it has cemented what I've said numerous times about the many people that have tried them and dislike them. Use them in a rigid design! It makes a difference.
Using the same blade in my Grande its a 2 1/2 pass BBS. No tugging, no skipping. The difference in blade exposure between the two is minimal.
Not only does it make a difference with Derby Extra, but it does every other blade I've tried as well.
Rigidity. Makes. A. Difference.
Now I will also say, a sharper blade may very well eliminate the tugging and skipping I experienced, but at the same time, wouldnt a more rigid design also elevate that blade too? Yep, it would.
Blades matter. How aggressively you use the razor makes that difference much greater.
But then there's a variable that's less quantifiable. Some beards are really, really tough. It doesn't make sense to assume that all beards are the same.
I have to agree on the Karve and the RR Wunderbar, extremely rigid.The razors I like are karve d and e and my RR wunderbar and also my new sc. Are the schick injectors a ridge design. If se razors are very ridged then I guess I will have to try one or probably many. Thanks.
Happy shaves
SMURF
There are a few that do.
Gillette Old Types, NEW SC, post war Tech, Fatip, RazoRock DE1 and Tech II, Timeless and Wolfman being the ones I'm aware of.
There is much to read around the DE forum in regards to rigid designs, but its like @jmudrick says, not everyone needs a rigid design.
I believe the point @psfred made has merit too. Matching a razor to ones own needs is the difficult part. The design that gives you the best shave is secondary.
My 1917 Single Ring.
Notice the floppy blade from the rolled over corners of the cap. Not a fun shave, at all lol. The blade was really bouncing around between the base and cap.
View attachment 905745
After 30 seconds of work with a metal nail file. That turned into a fantastically smoooth shaver.
View attachment 905746
Which Fatip would you recommend for the best blade support? I'm also considering a NEW SC and Timeless. I also really like Charcoal Goods but don't know how good it's blade support is.
Smart idea to go with something less expensive starting out. I'll start out with either a NEW SC or Fatip and see how it compares to my Karve. Thanks for the advice!
Have a Fatip Piccolo on the way from Maggards. Looking forward to comparing it to my Karve with OC C plate.
I'll be interested in reading your thoughts on it.
The test will be going atg on my cheeks and upper lip. I have to be careful with the angle on the Karve or it chatters leaving me with irritation. I don't have a particularly heavy beard but the whiskers I do have are thick in diameter.
I was examining my Karve earlier and it almost supports the bottom of the blade all the way to the lip of the cap, but not quite. My camera isn't the best but I've included a photo below. Not sure how much difference the Piccolo will make but curious to find out.
The Karve is design I like. If I got along better with blade gap, I might own one.
Using a Fatip you'll be more aware of the blade, so bear in mind angle of use is important and you can use it at any angle. Focus on hearing the blade cut while feeling as little blade as possible.
It also has much less blade gap. That translates to improved smoothness to me.
Having thicker harder to cut growth means blade choice can be more important.
I've been using Feather blades so far. I wanted to get used to the razor with just one brand of blade but it may be time to mix it up. I've got a selection of blades and @Earcutter even sent me a few unsolicited. B&B has some great members!
Try some PolSilver SIs.I've been using Feather blades so far. I wanted to get used to the razor with just one brand of blade but it may be time to mix it up. I've got a selection of blades and @Earcutter even sent me a few unsolicited. B&B has some great members!