I know this is one of the most debated issues in wet shaving today and we've never really gotten a clear answer, are the blades the same of not. I'm not here to tell you I definitively know the answer, but I want to add a bit more data to the debate.
Some of this info is from my other SEM thread, but most of it is new. I decided to start a new thread so this stuff isn't buried 6 pages deep.
The first set of images are of the 2 blades directly out of the package, no blade cleaning conducted.
Meds:
Labs:
In the next set I washed both blades in High Purity IPA (basically high grade rubbing alcohol) in a sonicating bath for 15 minutes. Then mounted the 2 blade with their edges facing each other and took a series of photos at different magnifications.
Meds (left) vs Labs (right):
You can see that when the blades are cleaned the surface and the edge look very similar, but the bevel area look different. Could this be the first indication that the blades are indeed different.
The next thing I did was mount the blades on edge and took photos at different magnifications. I also took some measurements of the edge features.
Meds:
Labs:
The measurements are relatively close, pretty well within my measuring error, except for the secondary bevel. It appears the secondary bevel is about 10% narrower on the Lab blade as compared to the Meds. Does this have any significance to the cutting ability or durability, I have no idea. This is just something to note.
The last thing I have is the elemental analysis for both blades.
Meds:
Labs:
The elemental analysis definitely makes it look like both blades use the same Stainless Steel alloy, which makes sense.
In the end, the side-by-side profile sure look different and makes me believe that the blades go through different grinding/sharpening regiments. This strengthens the argument that the blades are indeed different and the price difference is buying something (for better or worse).
Again, I've only sampled one blade of each, so by no means is this the end of the road on this debate. Left you face and wallet lead you to the right answer when it comes to Meds vs Labs.
Some of this info is from my other SEM thread, but most of it is new. I decided to start a new thread so this stuff isn't buried 6 pages deep.
The first set of images are of the 2 blades directly out of the package, no blade cleaning conducted.
Meds:
Labs:
In the next set I washed both blades in High Purity IPA (basically high grade rubbing alcohol) in a sonicating bath for 15 minutes. Then mounted the 2 blade with their edges facing each other and took a series of photos at different magnifications.
Meds (left) vs Labs (right):
You can see that when the blades are cleaned the surface and the edge look very similar, but the bevel area look different. Could this be the first indication that the blades are indeed different.
The next thing I did was mount the blades on edge and took photos at different magnifications. I also took some measurements of the edge features.
Meds:
Labs:
The measurements are relatively close, pretty well within my measuring error, except for the secondary bevel. It appears the secondary bevel is about 10% narrower on the Lab blade as compared to the Meds. Does this have any significance to the cutting ability or durability, I have no idea. This is just something to note.
The last thing I have is the elemental analysis for both blades.
Meds:
Labs:
The elemental analysis definitely makes it look like both blades use the same Stainless Steel alloy, which makes sense.
In the end, the side-by-side profile sure look different and makes me believe that the blades go through different grinding/sharpening regiments. This strengthens the argument that the blades are indeed different and the price difference is buying something (for better or worse).
Again, I've only sampled one blade of each, so by no means is this the end of the road on this debate. Left you face and wallet lead you to the right answer when it comes to Meds vs Labs.