I finally received my HD and have used it.
Two things came to mind when first examining it:
#1.) The machining is passable and it works, but nothing completely stands out as what I could look with glee and state to myself "Now That is German machining / engineering!"
That, in itself, isn't distressing at all though. I'd say the one thing I'm not totally happy with was:
#2.) Despite threading the top's post over 2 centimeters up (haven't measured it, and am not at home at the moment - but I'd say it may be threaded over an inch), without a blade in it the (or MY) Merkur HD only turns a total of 1 3/4 turns to be tight after the initial engagement. I haven't even tested how much less it turns with a blade in it.
So only the first ... I'm going to guess ... 15% or 20% of the threads are used, over and over again, despite the rod being threaded much farther up?
Of course this has its good side, too - changing a blade is that much faster ... though, to be honest, in the grand scheme of time-intensive things that wet-shaving entails I just don't see the use of so few threads as a plus in any way, shape or form. it may have only been a $30 item, but for what it is the HD could at least have delivered in the 'using more threads' department for long-term solidness.
Sure, ok, no-one has probably even screwed-up their threads on an HD yet... but I still don't like it.
Shaving-wise, the razor seems great.
Two things came to mind when first examining it:
#1.) The machining is passable and it works, but nothing completely stands out as what I could look with glee and state to myself "Now That is German machining / engineering!"
That, in itself, isn't distressing at all though. I'd say the one thing I'm not totally happy with was:
#2.) Despite threading the top's post over 2 centimeters up (haven't measured it, and am not at home at the moment - but I'd say it may be threaded over an inch), without a blade in it the (or MY) Merkur HD only turns a total of 1 3/4 turns to be tight after the initial engagement. I haven't even tested how much less it turns with a blade in it.
So only the first ... I'm going to guess ... 15% or 20% of the threads are used, over and over again, despite the rod being threaded much farther up?
Of course this has its good side, too - changing a blade is that much faster ... though, to be honest, in the grand scheme of time-intensive things that wet-shaving entails I just don't see the use of so few threads as a plus in any way, shape or form. it may have only been a $30 item, but for what it is the HD could at least have delivered in the 'using more threads' department for long-term solidness.
Sure, ok, no-one has probably even screwed-up their threads on an HD yet... but I still don't like it.
Shaving-wise, the razor seems great.