I've always "liked and/or tolerated" the smell of cigar smoke. But pipe smoke? That stuff is great! Why the difference? (I can only imagine the reasons for why both smell much better than cigarettes!!!)
thanks ...
thanks ...
Ammonia. Much lower in many pipe blends.I've always "liked and/or tolerated" the smell of cigar smoke. But pipe smoke? That stuff is great! Why the difference? (I can only imagine the reasons for why both smell much better than cigarettes!!!)
thanks ...
I think pipe tobacco is usually flavored and sweetened more than cigar tobacco.
Probably the best explanation I’ve ever heard. Thanks, I learned something new today.The curing and casing of pipe tobaccos are a little different, and may involve some mild sugars in various forms for the latter steps. But the big difference for the profound room note differences among tobacco genres are due to the curing times. Many raw tobacco varieties are full of ammonia, which accumulates during the death of the leaf. This is why attempting to smoke raw tobacco is an unpleasant and unrecommended practice.
One of the principal reasons for curing all tobaccos is to reduce that ammonia content.
But even the very best cigar tobaccos are only cured for two years at most. Most considerably less time. And cigarette base leaf is cured even less so. Conversely, two years is around the absolute minimum for even an inexpensive mass-produced pipe tobacco. The best pipe tobaccos may be cured for 4 or 5, or even more, years.
There is also a correlation between ammonia content and nicotine in many tobaccos. That is why some cigarette manufacturers even prefer higher ammonia levels; it increases the working nicotine content in the product. And it is why a good cigar often has a nice nicotine kick.
What most bystanders enjoy in the room note of a pipe tobacco is often the toppings found in aromatics. Toppings are exactly that: something applied to the already cured and/or cased base leaf. The sweet bakery and other aromas are usually the smoldering toppings, which are rarely, if ever, found in cigars and cigarettes.
But even a plain pipe blend that smells pleasantly homey like ‘grandpa’ is due to the above curing and casing efforts and times they enjoy.
Part of it, too, may be different varieties of leaf used. I can't recall too many pipe blends using Connecticut shade or Maduro leaf. Not many cigars touting Latakia or other Orientals.
You're right, and Kentos is right, too. And I was a little sloppy in commingling terms in an effort to describe with simplicity. Tobacco processing is still part science, and still part art.
The reason for ammonia in all tobacco is from the enzyme breakdown (oxidation) of the proteins contained in the leaf's chlorophyll. Facilitating and accelerating that natural breakdown is one of the objectives of the initial curing phase of processing. All tobacco has these proteins, and all will accumulate ammonia during curing as the proteins break down. But it does vary.
Cigar tobacco varieties typically possess a higher protein content than the usual pipe tobacco base leafs, and consequently accumulate higher ammonia levels in those initial curing stages. That is why most cigar tobacco is usually air-cured on pallets; flue or other more active curing methods would likely overheat the enzymes that are already generating plenty of heat ... and ammonia. Part of the curing process is also to get that accumulated ammonia out of the leaf. Which is why if you ever walked into a curing shed, the ammonia fumes might overwhelm you. Once the curing is done, it is done, and the enzyme breakdown of the proteins, and the accumulation of the resulting ammonia, is primarily completed. So even with ample airing, cigar tobaccos usually leave the curing sheds with higher residual ammonia levels than the pipe tobaccos do for this reason.
The subsequent processing steps are much slower, and do not cause further rapid accumulation of ammonia as curing does, although they can allow the further out-gassing and extraction of residual ammonia from the curing phase.
The aging stage is also sometimes called "fermenting", and is different from the earlier curing phase. Aging more involves the remaining sugars and other carbohydrates in the leaf, as opposed to the chlorophyll proteins above. Aging in wood may sometimes be used with cigar varieties, and it is almost always used with pipe varieties (that is why I typically refer to "casing" with pipe blends). I have seen Internet claims that cigar tobaccos may be aged after curing for up to 5 years, although in most real-world instances, it is usually only 2 years (and some cheaper machine brands are considerably less). Decent pipe tobaccos are typically aged in cases (or "cased") for a minimum of 4 years. Some pro-cigar Internet sources seem to imply the opposite, and that cigar leaf sits around aging for decades. Not true (perhaps later in their humidors). And additional ingredients are often added to pipe varieties during casing, which is not usually the case with cigar tobaccos.
So most pipe tobaccos tend to leave the curing sheds with less ammonia than cigar varieties do, and then tend to be more extravagantly aged and cased than cigar (and cigarette) varieties are. This is not to imply that good cigar tobacco is not well-aged before rolling. It is. Just differently. Some Cubans may also be subjected to an additional curing or aging step compared to others, but I'll leave for others to argue the effects of that.
But it's all about the ammonia as far as room note acridity is concerned. Cigar tobacco just typically has more of it after processing, and can leave a more offensive 'stench' to some bystanders as a result. Most pipe tobacco has less, and once you start adding toppings during the final blending, all sorts of pleasant room note consequences might follow. There are of course some exceptions and variations, as anyone with an offended bystander to some more potent English blends can attest.
As I hinted above, some cigarette manufacturers even ADD ammonia to their blends to enhance the nicotine performance, ironically to a relatively mild-mannered white Burley base as far as native ammonia content is concerned.
I only know these vague obscurities because I was interested in what I put in my mouth.
MR. COLOMBO: This is an excellent response and analysis of the fundamentals of the tobacco curing arts; Fascinating; A STUDIED READING of this post might even be enough to re-juvenate the waning fortunes of the once vibrant Tobacco growing culture of Leamington county in south-western Ontario! Well written!