I'm wondering if the difference of opinion regarding this method is due to differences in varying ability of brushes to retain water? Would a newer boar brush shed more water than a well broken in brush - or vice versa?
+1 VID-EO!We need a video.
I'm wondering if the difference of opinion regarding this method is due to differences in varying ability of brushes to retain water? Would a newer boar brush shed more water than a well broken in brush - or vice versa?
I'm wondering if the difference of opinion regarding this method is due to differences in varying ability of brushes to retain water? Would a newer boar brush shed more water than a well broken in brush - or vice versa?
Hmm, shouldn't people actually try this for themselves to see if it works for more than one person? All we have currently is a lot of fan love and no confirming experiences.
Was a massive dud for me and I tried it. To the letter. But I see I'm just being politely ignored.
I may not be a native English speaker, but I know there's a difference between the words 'hater' and 'critic'. I don't think the use of the first word is appropriate in the context of this thread, whereas the second would be.for all the haters out there , please stop drinking the hatoraide !
I may not be a native English speaker, but I know there's a difference between the words 'hater' and 'critic'. I don't think the use of the first word is appropriate in the context of this thread, whereas the second would be.
Oh yes.you savy me keemo sabi ???
The consequence is that you have to find out for yourself the hard way: it took me the better part of my stay to learn when it was appropriate to call someone a c**t, for example.
I agree with you there. But that doesn't explain the five or six times I overheard it—mostly between siblings, I should add. I figured it required a level of familiarity I would never be able to attain with them, in any case. But even as a calculated insult it carries with it a certain ... how to put this... degree of contempt or 'badness' (if that makes sense) the level of which is very hard for a foreigner to pick up.In that case, another quick lesson: it's never appropriate to call someone that. Even with asterisks, it is extremely ungentlemanly.
All this talk about whether to shake the brush, squeeze the brush, or just let it drip, etc., is of no consequence whatsoever.
In the end, a good lather has about the same ratio of water/product regardless of whether you started with a wet brush (like Marco does), or started with a dry-ish brush (as I do). I add water until it's like Marco's lather.
As long as you get enough product into the mix, and you're patient enough, and you know what a good lather looks and feels like, you end up with the same exact lather either way!
I prefer the dry brush because I use a lot less product and it's nowhere near as messy.
Whatever gives you the good lather is all good.
Marco , please keep on ignoring the haters ! As we say in america , ( haters going to hate ) !
I wouldn't say they broke out the bourbon as soon as he posted. I think that most people have tried it and liked it in the past. Simply a speculation, there is no way of saying for sure.However you put it, and regardless of all the smiley's used, putting down other people opinions AND direct experience, is poor form.
Marco espouses a method. It doesn't work across the board. All I've suggested is people actually try it, instead of instantly breaking out the bourbon every time Marco posts.
I wouldn't say they broke out the bourbon as soon as he posted. I think that most people have tried it and liked it in the past. Simply a speculation, there is no way of saying for sure.
That being said, I was skeptical of this method at first. Very very very skeptical. But I tried it, and it worked amazingly. The only problem for me was there was too much lather. It was very hard to handle. But that isn't much of a complaint now is it?