Modifying Safety Razor Aggressiveness & Efficiency with Blade, Shims, Reverse Shims, and Tape Strips

[ShavingByTheNumbers]

I was thinking about the practicality of taping razors that clamp down on a blade very close to the edges. In pondering the possibilities, this is what I came up with for my NEW SC.
.View attachment 840862
That's 2 layers of Frogtape at the center of the baseplate and 2 at the edges of the topcap. I plan to try it out tomorrow with a fresh Feather New Hi-Stainless.

That vintage Silver Star is destined to become a shim. It's stainless steel and much thicker and stiffer than modern blades. (I did shave with that Silver Star twice, and that was quite enough for me )

Why elevate the cap in the middle with tape? Is the center tape for making a tighter fit for blade alignment?

 

[SGWB]

Why elevate the cap in the middle with tape? Is the center tape for making a tighter fit for blade alignment?

It's to get more curve in the blade and, hopefully, reduce blade angle. As you point out earlier, applying tape to just the topcap in a razor like this would only raize the cap, not deflect the blade downward, because the blade is directly clamped between the tape and the baseplate just taping the topcap would not deflect the blade at all. By raising the center of the blade it changes the overall razor geometry, forcing the blade into a smaller radius curve. I could probably do the same with a narrow cut shim. I may try that next.

 

[ShavingByTheNumbers]

It's to get more curve in the blade and, hopefully, reduce blade angle. As you point out earlier, applying tape to just the topcap in a razor like this would only raize the cap, not deflect the blade downward, because the blade is directly clamped between the tape and the baseplate just taping the topcap would not deflect the blade at all. By raising the center of the blade it changes the overall razor geometry, forcing the blade into a smaller radius curve. I could probably do the same with a narrow cut shim. I may try that next.

I looked back at the picture and drew a picture for myself. I think that the razor will clamp down on the blade very similarly near the cutting edges. The blade will be forced up near the center a bit, but then be forced down and seemingly against the baseplate near the edges. The radius of curvature would be smaller near the center, but larger as you approach the edges, and then shrink some closer to the edges. What you did is very interesting. In my estimation, the major effect is that the blade will be drawn in a little as if the blade width were smaller. I don't know if the effect will be enough to notice, but the blade exposure will be a little less and the guard span will be a little more. You could apply a narrow shim, as you mentioned, instead of the tape along the center of the baseplate. You're right about that. I could be wrong about what I wrote here, but I'm pretty sure about it. Please share what happens, okay?

 

[SGWB]

I looked back at the picture and drew a picture for myself. I think that the razor will clamp down on the blade very similarly near the cutting edges. The blade will be forced up near the center a bit, but then be forced down and seemingly against the baseplate near the edges. The radius of curvature would be smaller near the center, but larger as you approach the edges, and then shrink some closer to the edges. What you did is very interesting. In my estimation, the major effect is that the blade will be drawn in a little as if the blade width were smaller. I don't know if the effect will be enough to notice, but the blade exposure will be a little less and the guard span will be a little more. You could apply a narrow shim, as you mentioned, instead of the tape along the center of the baseplate. You're right about that. I could be wrong about what I wrote here, but I'm pretty sure about it. Please share what happens, okay?

I had thought about that. The clamping at the edge will tend to bend the blade back up, almost like a recurve bow. But if I don't tighten the razor too much the effect should be controlled.

I used your method to test the blade exposure with a short plastic straight edge. It is reduced to very nearly zero or barely positive. You are correct
in that prediction.

 

[ShavingByTheNumbers]

I had thought about that. The clamping at the edge will tend to bend the blade back up, almost like a recurve bow.

Yes! I wish that I had thought of those words to describe it.

But if I don't tighten the razor too much the effect should be controlled.

Yes. The blade might not be as secure or rigid, but what you're saying makes sense.

I used your method to test the blade exposure with a short plastic straight edge. It is reduced to very nearly zero or barely positive. You are correct in that prediction.

Excellent! Thanks for confirming that, @SGWB! It just hit me that another reason for the drop in blade exposure is that the tape near the edge will act like a reverse shim, which shifts the shave plane and decreases the blade exposure even with the same blade curvature. If you have the cap not tightened down as much, that would also shift the shave plane even more vertically and decrease the blade exposure even more.

 

[Jill Snoddon]

Summary

• A guide for modifying DE and SE safety razor aggressiveness and efficiency is presented and explained in detail
• Modifications of blade width, blade thickness, shims, reverse shims, and tape strips under cap edges are considered with respect to their effects on safety razor parameters, particularly blade exposure and guard span
• Aggressiveness (the ability to cut and irritate skin) and efficiency (the ability to cut hair close to skin) are distinct concepts and, in the simplest approximation, follow guard span and blade exposure, respectively
• Blade rigidity (the resistance to blade cutting edge deflection) also relates to aggressiveness and efficiency and should be considered, along with blade sharpness and smoothness, when modifying safety razors
• Modifications are impractical or infeasible for some DE and SE safety razors, especially those SE safety razors that only allow room for the blade to be inserted
• The guide includes a convenient, easy-to-use table on what modifications to use in order to achieve the desired effects on blade exposure and guard span
• It is best to physically check blade exposure using a small smooth flat piece of hard plastic

Introduction

On October 8, 2017, I posted my review of the Edwin Jagger (EJ) Kelvin with the standard DE89 head found on all other Edwin Jagger razors (B&B URL). My tailoring of aggressiveness and efficiency with the blade, shims, and tape strips was illustrated and discussed in that review, and on October 10, 2017, I asked whether I should start a separate thread about the use of tape and shims to modify aggressiveness (B&B URL). The response was positive and led to the development of this broad guide for modifying double-edge (DE) and single-edge (SE) safety razor aggressiveness and efficiency with blade properties, shims, reverse shims, and tape strips under cap edges.

Guide for Modifying DE and SE Safety Razor Aggressiveness and Efficiency

The guide for modifying DE and SE safety razors is shown below. The sections that follow offer further details. This guide for modifying aggressiveness and efficiency with blade width, blade thickness, shims, reverse shims, and tape strips under cap edges applies to safety razors in general, both DE and SE. How the modification options affect safety razor parameters is explained, especially with respect to guard span and blade exposure as they generally relate to aggressiveness and efficiency, respectively. The guidance offered here is not meant to apply for all DE and SE razors, since some modification options are not practical or feasible for certain razors, and some users may be opposed to modifying their razors. However, for those that can and wish to modify their razors in the hopes of better shaves, this guide should prove useful.

Guard Span and Blade Exposure Relate to Aggressiveness and Efficiency

It is important to define the terms "aggressiveness" and "efficiency". Aggressiveness is the ability of a safety razor with blade to cut and irritate skin, while efficiency is the ability of a safety razor with blade to cut hair close to skin. In other words, aggressiveness is the potential for cuts and irritation, especially with bad technique, while efficiency is the potential for getting close shaves, especially with good technique. Aggressiveness and efficiency are distinct concepts, even though razors are often labeled on a single scale from very "mild" to very "aggressive", and yet, aggressiveness and efficiency are related. There is an interconnectivity, but in the simplest approximation, aggressiveness goes with guard span and efficiency goes with blade exposure.

Guard span and blade exposure are illustrated in the guide above such that guard span is the distance along the shave plane from the blade cutting edge to the safety razor guard and blade exposure is the displacement of the blade cutting edge from the shave plane with the positive direction pointing away from the razor. Blade angle, cap span, and handle angle are also shown, but when it comes to aggressiveness and efficiency, guard span and blade exposure dominate. The greater the guard span, the greater the potential for skin to snag or bunch up in front of the blade cutting edge, increasing the likelihood of cuts and irritation. Greater blade exposure also increases blade feel and the risk of getting "bitten", too, but blade exposure is more related to efficiency, since more blade exposure brings the blade cutting edge closer to the skin for a closer shave.

Blade rigidity, the resistance to blade cutting edge deflection, also relates to aggressiveness and efficiency. Sharpness and smoothness of the blade matter, too. All of these factors should be considered when modifying a safety razor.

Effects of Individual Modifications on Safety Razor Parameters

The guide presented here considers five modifications: blade width, blade thickness, shims, reverse shims, and tape strips under cap edges. Their effects on safety razor parameters are succinctly tabulated in the guide, but supporting details are provided in this section.

Blade width, the distance between cutting edges for a flat DE blade or the distance between the cutting edge and the spine edge for a flat SE blade, varies from brand to brand. The most important effect of blade width is that increasing/decreasing blade width increases/decreases blade exposure, which generally increases/decreases efficiency outside of changes that are directly related to blade sharpness and smoothness. Another important effect of blade width is in how using blades with more width results in less guard span, which generally results in less safety razor aggressiveness. More blade width also results in less blade rigidity and more cap span, but these effects are usually less significant compared to the effects on blade exposure and guard span for actual safety razors. Blade width has no effect on blade and handle angles.

Blade thickness has almost no effect on blade exposure, guard span, cap span, blade angle, and handle angle, given the relatively small variations in blade thickness, but blade thickness does significantly affect blade rigidity. Blade rigidity is proportional to the material's elastic modulus and the cube of the blade thickness. With elastic modulus being fairly consistent across different steels, regardless of tempering or hardness, a 0.1 mm thick blade is calculated as having about 137 % of the rigidity of a 0.09 mm thick blade. Blade deflection is inversely proportional to blade rigidity, so a 0.1 mm thick blade will have about 73 % of the deflection of a 0.09 mm thick blade.



Shims are by far the most common modification. Shimming is known for making safety razors more aggressive. This is usually explained by how shims increase the blade gap between the guard and the blade cutting edge, but the increases in guard span and blade exposure generally account for the performance difference in aggressiveness and efficiency. The illustration above shows how the increases in guard span and blade exposure occur due to the shims moving up the blade and cap and making the shave plane more vertical. Cap span is likely to insignificantly change. Blade angle increases, which affects aggressiveness and efficiency, but in a considerably smaller way compared to the increases in guard span and blade exposure. Handle angle decreases by the same magnitude that blade angle increases. Geometric differences aside, shimming is known for increasing blade rigidity, which happens because of the extra support provided to the blade by the shims.

Reverse shims may not be as commonly used as shims, but they can be as useful for razor modification. As depicted by the illustration above, reverse shims raise the cap and shift the shave plane to a more vertical angle. In the process, reverse shims decrease blade exposure, which effectively decreases efficiency, while insignificantly altering guard span and aggressiveness. Cap span is, of course, increased by reverse shims, which could affect razor performance. The changes to blade and handle angles are practically or identically the same as with shims. The increase in blade rigidity also parallels that with shims, except that reverse shims add support along the top of the blade.

Tape strips under cap edges have been used by few and have only recently been photographed (B&B URL), but tape strips should become known as a useful modification option, just as much as shims and reverse shims. The picture above shows how tape strips deflect the blade cutting edge, causing blade exposure and guard span to decrease. Thus, tape strips effectively cause less aggressiveness and efficiency, although the effect to efficiency is likely to be most pronounced. Blade angle is also decreased by tape strips, probably resulting in further, yet minor, drops in aggressiveness and efficiency. The decrease in guard span is accompanied by an equal and opposite increase in cap span. Handle angle is unaffected by tape strips because they do not change the shave plane. Blade rigidity, on the other hand, is decreased by tape strips, since they increase the distance that the blade is free of contact from the cap and they also make the cap support softer. The decrease in blade rigidity would be expected as minor compared to increases in blade rigidity from shims and reverse shims.

Practicality and Feasibility of Individual Modifications

Important points should be made with respect to the practicality and feasibility of the various modification options:

• Blades with different properties are available for almost all safety razors. Unfortunately, blade width and thickness are only practical options when the user knows what they are. The user cannot be expected to measure razor blades, but if the user wants a blade with a different width, thickness, sharpness, and/or smoothness, a robust table with overall dimensions and user ratings would be easy to use. Such a table has been started for DE razor blades (B&B URL). It is possible for users to become familiar with which blades are particularly wide, narrow, thick, and thin, just as users become accustomed with blade sharpness and smoothness.
• The typical adjustable razor raises or lowers the blade and cap, which is like adding or removing shims without getting extra blade rigidity. Shims increase the blade exposure, the guard span, and the blade angle, so the typical adjustable razor does the same when increasing its level.
• Shims, reverse shims, and tape strips are not feasible options for some safety razors, especially those SE safety razors that only allow room for the blade to be inserted.
• Tape strip layers may be different on each side of a DE safety razor head for asymmetric performance. For example, tape strips can be added under one cap edge only for a side with less aggressiveness and efficiency.
• Tape strips are impractical for razors in which the blade is simply cantilevered by the cap and baseplate, since the tape would just be clamped between the cap and blade and not cause any downward deflection of the blade.
• Tapes are made with different backing materials and adhesives, so tapes vary in (a) thickness, (b) elasticity, (c) ease of cutting with scissors, (d) ease of applying to the underside of a cap, (e) durability when exposed to water during shaves, and (f) ease of removal of residual adhesive. Painter's tape is the author's preferred choice, based on experimentation with many tapes.

Modifications for Desired Changes to Blade Exposure and Guard Span

Irrespective of practicality and feasibility, individual modifications can be combined in order to combine their effects. The bottom table in the guide shows the combinations of modifications that yield increases (+), insignificant or no changes (∼), and decreases (−) in blade exposure and guard span. This table naturally follows from the table for individual effects on safety razor parameters, but the best combinations are not easily determined at first glance. Hence, it is fitting to have the combinations presented in a convenient table to make it easier for the user to modify safety razor efficiency and aggressiveness with respect to blade exposure and guard span, respectively.

The user needs only to decide what changes are desired for blade exposure and guard span in order to find what modifications are prescribed for the desired effects. Let's take the simple case of no desired changes in blade exposure (∼) and guard span (∼). We move down the table to the corresponding row and see that the table shows to add more shims (+) and more tape strips (+). This is because tape strips rotate the blade down while shims push the blade and cap up, resulting in a combined effect of the blade cutting edge roughly staying put relative to the shifted shave plane. The precise number of shims depends on the geometry of the tape with the particular razor and blade, but with some trial and error, the user can figure out a combination that works. Adding tape strips and shims to yield a similar blade exposure and guard span might seem odd, but the modifications cause an overall increase in blade rigidity.

A few more features should be understood when reading the final table of the guide. The first case in the final table, the case for more blade exposure (+) and more guard span (+), is illustrative. The table advises by a greater-than sign (>) that more shims (+) should be added than reverse shims that are added, if any (possibly +), which is because adding shims increases guard span and adding more shims than reverse shims creates a net positive change in blade exposure. Changes in blade width and tape strips could be employed, as well, but more complicated configurations go beyond the simpler guidance offered by the table.

The guidance for less blade exposure (−) and more guard span (+) is also simple, but it involves two options separated by a horizontal dotted line. The first modification option is simply to use less blade width (−). The second modification option is to add shims (+) and reverse shims (+), but less (<) shims than reverse shims, since adding more reverse shims than shims would cause a net negative change in blade exposure and the positive change in guard span would be due to the shims alone. The horizontal dotted line between the two options indicates that either option may be used alone or both options may be used at the same time to accomplish the desired effects.

Checking Blade Exposure with Small Smooth Flat Piece of Hard Plastic

Modifying safety razors can be made easier and more reliable with a simple check of blade exposure, which is usually more sensitive than guard span to configuration changes. Blade exposure can be physically inspected with a small smooth flat piece of hard plastic, such that the piece will (a) teeter on the blade cutting edge when blade exposure is positive, (b) contact both the guard and the cap but catch on the blade cutting edge when blade exposure is zero or neutral, or (c) freely slide back and forth against the guard and the cap when blade exposure is negative. The author's plastic piece is pictured below as it is lightly situated in a horizontal position against a razor head.



The smooth flat piece of clear hard acrylic is about 1 cm wide by about 3 cm long by precisely 1.91 mm thick, but the dimensions are not critical. Any small, smooth, flat piece of hard plastic will do. The piece just needs to be small and light enough to allow for the user to physically feel and check blade exposure at different points along the blade cutting edge. One finger is used to move or teeter the piece around, depending on the blade exposure. As can be observed in the picture above, the author's clear acrylic piece has acquired many fine scratches. The scratches have accumulated after much use of the acrylic piece, which is still working as well as when it was first used.

Real Examples of Modifying Safety Razor Aggressiveness and Efficiency

The method described above for checking blade exposure was employed in the real examples of safety razor modifications that are pictured below. In the default configuration, without any modification, the blade exposure was positive, as confirmed by the teetering of the small plastic piece against the blade cutting edge. A narrower blade, as pictured in the top-right corner of the picture, decreased the blade exposure, making it slightly positive or neutral, and increased the guard span.



The bottom-left corner of the picture shows the original configuration, but with two shims and two reverse shims. This situation with the same number of added shims and reverse shims is shown by the guide's bottom table as resulting in a similar blade exposure and an increased guard span, and as verified with a small plastic piece, the blade exposure was very similar as before with no modification. The shims and reverse shims also increased the blade rigidity and the blade angle, which certainly affect aggressiveness and efficiency to some extent. The bottom-right corner of the picture shows what happened to the default configuration when one layer of blue painter's tape was added under the top cap edges and one shim was added under the blade. According to the guide, this modification would either cause blade exposure and guard span to hardly change or cause both blade exposure and guard span to decrease. Given the particular razor and blade and the specific modifications, the latter case occurred such that the blade exposure decreased to being slightly positive or neutral. Guard span decreased, as expected, and so did blade angle. Blade rigidity was believed to have increased overall on account of the shim increasing blade rigidity more than the tape strip layer decreased blade rigidity.

Acknowledgement

Special thanks belong to @Cal for his helpful feedback. Cal's suggestions and questions really helped improve the guide. Thanks, buddy.

Final Thoughts

Different reactions to this guide are expected. Whatever you might think about it, please, at least THINK about it. Even if you might be against the idea of modifying razors, you could use this guide to briefly investigate changes in blade exposure and guard span, which could lead to a better understanding of what works best for you and ultimately lead to razors that are better suited for you. Look at me. At first, I was against the idea of modifying razors out of principle, but now, I experiment with razor modifications and I'm the one who just put together a guide for others to tinker with their razors.

Great Study.

 

[ShavingByTheNumbers]

Great Study.

Thanks, Jill.

 

[Jill Snoddon]

Thanks, Jill.

I'll be using another mild razor tonight my RazoRock DE 1 and shimming it also. I have more aggressive razors but the real mild ones benefit from rigidity and blade gap without sacrificing smoothness.

 

[ShavingByTheNumbers]

I'll be using another mild razor tonight my RazoRock DE 1 and shimming it also. I have more aggressive razors but the real mild ones benefit from rigidity and blade gap without sacrificing smoothness.

I've heard good things about the RazoRock DE1. What you said about rigidity also makes sense. Some here really swear by blade rigidity, and they might be right in general, not just for themselves.

 

[Jill Snoddon]

I've heard good things about the RazoRock DE1. What you said about rigidity also makes sense. Some here really swear by blade rigidity, and they might be right in general, not just for themselves.

The DE 1 is a good little razor.
Well, just completed my shave with the DE 1 shimmed. Compared to shimming the Mamba last night, it created a much wider blade gap so not as smooth as usual but I had no reaction to alum afterward. I don't usually use alum, but I wanted to test the irritation shimming might have caused. I'm on Day 7 use of a Dorco Prime Blade and still got a BBS on my legs, et al.
My favorite thing about shimming is definitely the blade rigidity.

 

[Esox]

Some here really swear by blade rigidity, and they might be right in general, not just for themselves.

It makes a difference.

 

[Deltaboy]

Great store of information!

 

[Tokyospike]

Some here really swear by blade rigidity . . .

You talkin’ to me? You talkin’ to ME?

 

[Ebberman]

It's all very interesting, but none of it seems to work with butterfly opening.

 

[Ron R]

It's all very interesting, but none of it seems to work with butterfly opening.

If you are trying to make your butterfly razor a little more aggressive all I do is add a Kai SS DE blade.
It is a wider blade than a Gillette Astra SP by 9/1000 of inch or 4.5/1000 " per side. I find it gives a nice bump up in performance and is superior to Shimming a razor. The blade is sharp & smooth with excellent longevity.

Have some great shaves!

 

[Ebberman]

Thank you, but I'm trying to tame a couple of overly aggressive butterfly razors. They were cheap and I could easily throw them away, but that isn't in my nature. Shims don't work. I haven't tried tape yet, but it is so temporary and may not work. The butterfly mechanism exerts little force on the blade. I would never buy another.
It is my experience that cheap razors are usually aggressive, and one has to pay more for a comfortable shave.

 

[ShavingByTheNumbers]

Thank you, but I'm trying to tame a couple of overly aggressive butterfly razors. They were cheap and I could easily throw them away, but that isn't in my nature. Shims don't work. I haven't tried tape yet, but it is so temporary and may not work. The butterfly mechanism exerts little force on the blade. I would never buy another.
It is my experience that cheap razors are usually aggressive, and one has to pay more for a comfortable shave.

The best DE razor for me is still my modified Fatip Piccolo (Mk 2) with a reverse shim and UHMW tape around the outside of the whole cap, wrapping around and under the cap. I've used that for years. It's kind of gross how lather and hair residue has partially gotten under the tape, but I have to say that the tape has held up very well. I want to get away from this setup, though. External UHMW tape could work well with butterfly razors, but only for so long before the adhesive would give. Following what @Ron R said about blade width, you could try a narrower blade. The Treet Platinum was the narrowest blade that I found with an average blade width of 21.82 mm. The Treet Platinum has a blade width about 0.14 mm less than average, as opposed to the Kai with its blade width about 0.22 mm above average. Good luck!

 

[santamariasteve]

Brother Numbers,

My thanks for your good quality research and work on the complicated issue of shimming DE razors. My takeaway from all this is YMMV, which is no stranger to the forum. I'm 85, have shaved daily since 1951, and have tough "old man whiskers." What I do know for certain (I think) is this:

A mild Muhle R89 with 2 conventional sims under the working blade is the most perfect razor I have encountered, all things considered. I have about 70 DE and SE razors.

I also get pretty good results from the humble and mild Gillette Tech, that has a single shim under the working blade, AND the working blade is loosened a small fraction of turning the handle as the old-timey Gillette instructions suggest.

To make a razor less aggressive is a little trickier, at least to me. I've discovered doing a two-pass shave instead of a three-pass shave is a reasonable alternative. I've tried a shim or two on top of the working blade, but my jury is still out on that method.

However, my favorite razor style is an adjustable, which would make moot the value of shimming for most shavers. I also like to keep things simple.

In any event, YMMV still reigns!

 

[GoodShave]

Brother Numbers,

My thanks for your good quality research and work on the complicated issue of shimming DE razors. My takeaway from all this is YMMV, which is no stranger to the forum. I'm 85, have shaved daily since 1951, and have tough "old man whiskers." What I do know for certain (I think) is this:

A mild Muhle R89 with 2 conventional sims under the working blade is the most perfect razor I have encountered, all things considered. I have about 70 DE and SE razors.

I also get pretty good results from the humble and mild Gillette Tech, that has a single shim under the working blade, AND the working blade is loosened a small fraction of turning the handle as the old-timey Gillette instructions suggest.

To make a razor less aggressive is a little trickier, at least to me. I've discovered doing a two-pass shave instead of a three-pass shave is a reasonable alternative. I've tried a shim or two on top of the working blade, but my jury is still out on that method.

However, my favorite razor style is an adjustable, which would make moot the value of shimming for most shavers. I also like to keep things simple.

In any event, YMMV still reigns!

Thanks for posting this! I am going to try shims with my R89 and Tech ball end and see how it goes. First I have to make some shims.

 

[APBinNCA]

I am not sure that the value of a reverse shim is moot, I too need to make some shims. Others have posted that, with chatterbox razors, the amount of stiffening is noticeable. I had actually planned to start my Tech clone with one shim above and one under with as wide of a shim as I can cut about a year ago. Too many things going on!