Another report on the LeGrelot #193:
Another 13 feather light laps on new LaLune using water bottle w/ a couple drops of dish soap and two drops of Glycerin directly on the stone.
Honing feedback same as usual, right in the wheelhouse, undercut outstanding.
Cleaned and then stropped on Cordovan only w/ a few very light palm strop strokes. Total strokes on the new LaLune 40.
HHT still 5's right across, root in or out.
Visual under 100X bench scope, edge showed no signs of additional artifacts, very even & polished > no discernable difference from last honing.
Shave was better very slightly, 8 day beard, edge still not tedious to shave with. Very smooth using very light hand.
Post shave 99+ BBS no weepers or irritation. Alum block hardly noticeable, face feel great.
This outcome lines up very favorably w/my vintage extra fine stone, I don't think I could tell a difference between the two on this razor. Given the testing so far I think both stones max an edge out at about the same # of finishing strokes. So far I'm seeing no signs of edge deterioration and the edge is right where I want it - very keen - not tedious - very smooth shaving and outstanding post shave feel.
I'm sending this razor off to a member on the east coast who has a very coarse wiry beard to see what he thinks of the edge and see how it holds up to his shaving.
This evaluation leads me to think that this newly marketed example of the LaLune stone qualifies it as a very good finisher, minimal work from 12K to finish an edge to a very high standard (for my face & beard) and would>will make an excellent touch-up stone & finisher.
Even a relatively small specimen (bout) would make a great barber hone replacement. IMO a very good value, and as long as a operator has a light hand dead easy to use.
I have not used this stone w/slurry or used the included slurry stone.
I will certainly experiment on other razors and explore using the stone w/slurry perhaps like a Thuri to see what that use might have to offer.
Frank
Another 13 feather light laps on new LaLune using water bottle w/ a couple drops of dish soap and two drops of Glycerin directly on the stone.
Honing feedback same as usual, right in the wheelhouse, undercut outstanding.
Cleaned and then stropped on Cordovan only w/ a few very light palm strop strokes. Total strokes on the new LaLune 40.
HHT still 5's right across, root in or out.
Visual under 100X bench scope, edge showed no signs of additional artifacts, very even & polished > no discernable difference from last honing.
Shave was better very slightly, 8 day beard, edge still not tedious to shave with. Very smooth using very light hand.
Post shave 99+ BBS no weepers or irritation. Alum block hardly noticeable, face feel great.
This outcome lines up very favorably w/my vintage extra fine stone, I don't think I could tell a difference between the two on this razor. Given the testing so far I think both stones max an edge out at about the same # of finishing strokes. So far I'm seeing no signs of edge deterioration and the edge is right where I want it - very keen - not tedious - very smooth shaving and outstanding post shave feel.
I'm sending this razor off to a member on the east coast who has a very coarse wiry beard to see what he thinks of the edge and see how it holds up to his shaving.
This evaluation leads me to think that this newly marketed example of the LaLune stone qualifies it as a very good finisher, minimal work from 12K to finish an edge to a very high standard (for my face & beard) and would>will make an excellent touch-up stone & finisher.
Even a relatively small specimen (bout) would make a great barber hone replacement. IMO a very good value, and as long as a operator has a light hand dead easy to use.
I have not used this stone w/slurry or used the included slurry stone.
I will certainly experiment on other razors and explore using the stone w/slurry perhaps like a Thuri to see what that use might have to offer.
Frank