It is curious, though, that Gore gets so much credit for all of this. He has contributed no actual data or proof to this argument. All he has done is sensationalized the issue with factually inaccurate agitprop.
A London court has now found that there were 11 inaccuracies in his film:
* The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Governments expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
* The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
* The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Governments expert had to accept that it was not possible to attribute one-off events to global warming.
* The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Governments expert had to accept that this was not the case.
* The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
* The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimants evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
* The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
* The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
* The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
* The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
* The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.
Furthermore, if his case is so convincing that this planet is on a downward spiral of man-made global warming, why was the (inaccurate) date of 1998 given as the hottest in the U.S.? We are now almost ten years out from that date, and none of these intervening years have now become the new "hottest" year in the U.S. in history. In fact, with the newly corrected data, it turns out that 6 of the 10 hottest years on record in the U.S. were on or before 1953, with the hottest being 1934. If we are experiencing so much warming, I would have thought the top 10 list would have been more heavily slanted towards the latter end of the 20th century.
A London court has now found that there were 11 inaccuracies in his film:
* The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Governments expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
* The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
* The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Governments expert had to accept that it was not possible to attribute one-off events to global warming.
* The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Governments expert had to accept that this was not the case.
* The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
* The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimants evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
* The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
* The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
* The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
* The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
* The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.
Furthermore, if his case is so convincing that this planet is on a downward spiral of man-made global warming, why was the (inaccurate) date of 1998 given as the hottest in the U.S.? We are now almost ten years out from that date, and none of these intervening years have now become the new "hottest" year in the U.S. in history. In fact, with the newly corrected data, it turns out that 6 of the 10 hottest years on record in the U.S. were on or before 1953, with the hottest being 1934. If we are experiencing so much warming, I would have thought the top 10 list would have been more heavily slanted towards the latter end of the 20th century.
