- Thread starter
- #21
Steve56
Ask me about shaving naked!
I have a few, though in general they do sit more commonly as pre-finishers. The big problem with slates is they tend to be very slow because the metamorphic change involved in their creation rounds and flattens the silica / quartz in them. As well as (sometimes) making the particles bigger/combined and creating larger micas - the reason that schists are generally coarser than slates.
The reason Thuris are so fine is, as you say, that they're barely really a slate - they seem to occupy a kind of liminal position between silt/mudstone and slate. I am not a geologist by any means, but I think that petrologically speaking they might be called an 'Argillite'. Just one with an unusually high amount of fine silica in it.
All of it exists on spectrums anyway, and the formation of slate involves two distinct aspects; further lithification, and thermal metamorphism. The varying extent of how those two combine, as well as the composition of initial deposits, will determine how suitable a resulting rock will be for honing.
I always like to say that Thuris are a half-baked Ark. And that’s a good thing.