I am not saying it’s not by Muhle, but it’s a sightly different head cap design. It’s possible that Gillette spec’d it to Muhle for their own specification. Who knows.Fair enough.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Cap without the notch might be cheaper to manufacture ? No idea. Does Muhle use the notchless cap in another razor? Interesting Gillette would go to the trouble.I am not saying it’s not by Muhle, but it’s a sightly different head cap design. It’s possible that Gillette spec’d it to Muhle for their own specification. Who knows.
For the money, the Gillette is a better value compared to the R89 if anybody was thinking of getting a R89.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I've made the new Gillette Heritage my daily shaver.[My review from another thread.]
Been using mine for a few days now and I have to say, this shaver may replace my Merkur Progress as my daily shaver (using Astra SPs).
Construction is superb, polished under the cap etc. and I've always liked a 3 piece design. Grippy handle.
Shave is top notch. Smooth and aggressive enough to get a BBS shave with 2.5 passes, the same as my Progress. Perfect blade registration, size, balance and weight.
It's an easy shaver, like a Merkur 34c, never worried about cutting myself. (A 34c used to be my second favorite shaver.) I'd say it's a little more aggressive than a 34c.
And the travel case is high quality and a nice touch.
Gillette certainly did their homework here.
If you scroll up the chat you will see I made this comparisonIf anyone has an Edwin Jagger Kelvin, it might be good to compare it with the Gillette Heritage. The Kelvin has a knurled handle that's different from the Heritage, but may be a close match.
Fatip makes the head for the Schone. Unlike the Fatip Mk2, Schone is not marked at all with any sort of logo or identifying marks. People still call it a Schone never the less, as well as they call the Fatip Mk1 a Fatip even though it has no identifying logo like the Fatip Mk2.Nicely done! And I like your perspective. "Look at it this way, if Gillette doesn't want to mark their new razor as a Gillette, than I will agree with them and I also won't call it a Gillette." I couldn't agree more.
Pot metal needs that thickness because it's brittle. The bottom plate would constantly snap in half during handle tightening.Meanwhile, 113 years later...
I thought this picture of the heads was interesting - ying & yang.
View attachment 1036854
I shaved half with my Heritage and half with my Single-Ring yesterday. The vintage is MUCH more efficient. Well, that doesn't really hit the nail on the head. The vintage has no blade gap and holds the blade at a much lower angle so you have to hold it at a very steep on the angle. The vintage is essentially a perpendicular shavette with some safety teeth on it, haha.
The feedback on the vintage is very solid and muted because the blade is supported to the very edge. The feedback on the Heritage is louder, but reassuringly solid - not tinny, and I had no chatter issues at all. ATG in problem areas requires a bit more attention with the vintage. Of the two, the heritage is much more forgiving and therefore more appropriate for someone starting out, which was likely their intent. In terms of results, of course the first pass on the vintage is closer, but they're both capable of fantastic results. No complaints at all. Presentation, quality - very nice.