So a couple of weeks ago I went on a Disney Cruise. As most cruise ships do, they had a spa aboard. When we first boarded the ship, there were signs in every elevator offering men's barbering services. These had not been listed on the pre-boarding sign-up; they had not secured a barber until the very last minute. I've been looking to get a straight shave for a little while, so I figured I'd go and see what was being offered. I talked with the barber, a nice enough lady, although not a native English speaker. I asked what kind of razor she used, and she told me a Mach 3. I thanked her for her time and told her I needed to check my schedule before signing up. She pitched all of the creams she would use to prevent in-grown hairs and the like, and told me to hurry back because she was the only certified barber aboard and her slots were filling up quickly. (Incidentally, I'm not sure why you need a certified barber in international waters on a ship flying a foreign flag, but whatever)
I don't see why you need a certified barber to use a Mach 3. I tend libertarian, and I can give strong arguments why there shouldn't be certifications for any profession, including doctors and lawyers. That said, I understand why we started requiring certifications of barbers. A straight razor is a dangerous thing, and people are nervous letting any stranger put one to their neck. But in this day and age, when most haircuts are with clippers and most shaves are with cartridges, what are barbers really doing?
I'm sure barbers will keep their monopoly for awhile longer. They are far from the worst in putting up barriers to entry. Michigan, for instance, has gone off of the deep end. If anyone is interested, the Institute for Justice (IJ) has started targeting these laws. They have interesting cases in Louisiana right now, one for a florist and one for some monks who make coffins. The ones for the monks was in the WSJ yesterday. It would be nice if the current barber regime was changed. Maybe you only need to be certified if you use a straight or shavette, and you can only call yourself a barber if you use a straight or shavette.
Thoughts?
I don't see why you need a certified barber to use a Mach 3. I tend libertarian, and I can give strong arguments why there shouldn't be certifications for any profession, including doctors and lawyers. That said, I understand why we started requiring certifications of barbers. A straight razor is a dangerous thing, and people are nervous letting any stranger put one to their neck. But in this day and age, when most haircuts are with clippers and most shaves are with cartridges, what are barbers really doing?
I'm sure barbers will keep their monopoly for awhile longer. They are far from the worst in putting up barriers to entry. Michigan, for instance, has gone off of the deep end. If anyone is interested, the Institute for Justice (IJ) has started targeting these laws. They have interesting cases in Louisiana right now, one for a florist and one for some monks who make coffins. The ones for the monks was in the WSJ yesterday. It would be nice if the current barber regime was changed. Maybe you only need to be certified if you use a straight or shavette, and you can only call yourself a barber if you use a straight or shavette.
Thoughts?