The assumption is a "premium" blade would be better....What have you found...which one is better?.....This is the blade everyone likes to ridicule.
I found them to treat me the same.The assumption is a "premium" blade would be better....What have you found...which one is better?.....This is the blade everyone likes to ridicule.
I found them to treat me the same.
A good budget blade for me. But there are certainly a good number of people out there who think they are garbage, and aren't afraid to tell you.
I asked people and now I will give my opinion: They are both a "high average" blade - I rate blades 1 - 5 in half increments... I would rate both a 4.0 - not 3.5 or 4.5, but 4.0. I can not tell any difference between them in a blind test.I agree with Steinmetz and Lurch--I have used, and like, both. But I think the Premiums are a notch above the Extras. That having been said, I get nice shaves from both.
Did not know about the change. My first Derby Extras were awful, but that was back in 2011-12 or so. Recently, I've been very happy with Premiers, though. Guess it's about time to test-drive some Extras.Most of those people seem to have formed their opinion based on the pre-2016 version of the Extras.
40 shaves?!?Premiums look like they are going to last much longer, but they still aren't a great blade for me. Maybe 40 shaves on a blade, far less than average. Better than Extra's though.