What's new

December Workshop- night photography

to compliment the December challenge, I have lifted a tutorial. Thanks you the author. the article as well as linke to part 2 and 3, are here: http://www.digital-photo-secrets.com/tip/1579/night-photography-primer-the-world-at-night/


Night Photography Primer: The World At Night

by David Peterson 2 comments
proxy.php

I know a lot of photographers who only really take pictures during the day. As someone who likes to have everything work right away without much extra effort, I can understand why. The night, after all, is kind of challenging to photograph. There’s a lot more setup time and a lot more room for error. You need to find the good spots, and it can take a little work. This is the first in a series of articles to help you get the best night photographs.


I wish my friends could know what I know about night time photography. If they did, I think they’d see why I’m so attracted to it. Yes, it’s much more work when you don’t have the sun shining down to give you those nice and fast shutter speeds. And yeah, you do need to lug a tripod around town with you (not all the time, but most of the time). Still, when everything does come together, night time photography is one of the more rewarding things you’ll do as a photographer.

What’s so great about night photography?

Night photography will always be interesting because it’s extremely colorful. At no other time is there such a presence of contrasting colors everywhere. You’ve got the bright reds and whites of cars passing by as well as the neon glow of signs on the boulevard. If you’re taking pictures at twilight, you can get some of the purples from the long gone sunset.
There’s so much room for creating pictures bursting at the seams with color contrast. That’s what appeals the most to me as a photographer. During the day, you usually have to wait for the right moment with the light. That’s not so when you’re shooting at night. As long as something is giving off light, it doesn’t matter when you photograph it. The light doesn’t change that much at all.

The Essential: A Tripod

proxy.php
You’re probably wondering where to get started with night photography. I’ll tell you right now. You will definitely need a tripod. Without one, you’re pretty much lost when it comes to getting most night time shots.
Why is that? Well, in order to get a bright enough picture at night, you have to leave your camera’s shutter open a lot longer than you would during the day. Here’s a comparison. During the day, your camera opens and closes its shutter in less than two hundredths of a second. At night, you’ll often keep your camera’s shutter open for longer than five seconds.
proxy.php

Bring on the neon lights!
These are some of the most colorful pictures you’ll ever take.
Not much can happen in two hundredths of a second, but a lot can happen in five seconds. Imagine what would happen if someone were to violently shake the canvas as you’re panting, and you can start to get an idea of what camera shake does to your pictures. Using a tripod at night prevents all of this. It keeps the “canvas,” which is your digital camera’s image sensor, from moving while the light from outside does the painting.
Do you need a fancy digital SLR to get started with night photography? Not at all. While it certainly does help to have all of those settings, the most important thing of all is what I just mentioned, stabilizing your camera. It doesn’t matter if your camera is a digital SLR or a point and shoot. If it isn’t stable, it won’t get the shot.
If you’re using a point-and-shoot, try to look for some way to control the shutter speed. By controlling the shutter speed, you can tell your camera to take in more light, which is exactly what you need for night photography. If you can’t control the shutter speed directly, use your camera’s night mode. It won’t give you the same fine degree sort of control, but you will get enough to do what you want with the shot.

What are the best subjects to photograph at night?

That’s a good question because there are just so many options. Like daytime photography, it really depends on what you personally prefer to photograph (plus what’s around you). Some people like vibrant cities while the nature lovers go for starlit landscapes.
The most important thing to consider is your light source and what’s being illuminated. That’s the key to getting good photos at night. Sometimes a lone streetlamp works if it’s illuminating an interesting subject. Oftentimes it doesn’t work precisely because it’s all alone and there isn’t much of anything else to bring your viewer into the photo.
Here’s what I think works:

  • Moonlit scenes with everything scarcely lit;
  • Cityscapes with cars buzzing through the most visually interesting parts of the frame and;
  • Avenues so bright from neon signs that you can see everything in crisp detail.
Those are just a few examples, but my point remains. It’s all about the light and what it’s illuminating.

Silhouettes

The night is also a great time to capture silhouettes. Most silhouettes have the same old lighting that we’re used to. We’ve seen dozens and dozens of images with the sun behind the subject, but how many do you see with bright lights behind your subject? It isn’t done all that often, and that’s what makes it interesting.
proxy.php

What a gorgeous night time silhouette using the moon as a light source.
I could go on and on. As a matter of fact, I will. Just not now. In the rest of the series, we’re going to attempt to take each one of these types of pictures. We’ll look at some very specific lighting techniques and other technical bits that you’ll find, for lack of a different word, illuminating.
Before we do that, I have a homework assignment for you. If you don’t have a tripod, get one. If you do have a tripod, go out tonight and pay attention to the two most important things. What is the light, and what is it illuminating? Write down two examples of something interesting being illuminated by interesting light. Please share them in the comments, and most importantly, have fun!
 
I'm only now finally getting an interest in night time stuff, so I have a long way to go. The only thing I've noticed so far for myself, is that with things like street lights I'm getting a good result say with a 'quicker' shot and a higher ISO, but as for architecturally, my results are better with a minimal ISO and a 'longer' shot, but then that screws up the lighting a bit sometimes. I need to find that happy medium somewhere.

Here's my first attempt from a couple weeks ago:

 
I like getting out when it is dark, I think the mood in a photo can be really intensified under those circumstances :001_smile

however, I can see I need to take on the village/city more :wink:


Here are some shots I have taken during the last couple of years

proxy.php


proxy.php


proxy.php


proxy.php
 
Some shots of landmarks in Berlin from October this year:


proxy.php


Brandenburg Gate


proxy.php


The Old Library


proxy.php


The statue of Alexander von Humboldt (scientist, explorer, writer) in front of Humboldt University


proxy.php


The Cathedral


proxy.php


The TV Tower, Germany's highest building standing tall at 346 m/1,135 ft.


Mind you, it isn't much of a challenge to take halfway decent night shots when you've got acceptable equipment and great landmarks like in the city centre of Berlin, especially when they serve as the projections screens for fantastic and creative illumination effects as during the Festival of Lights.
 
About as far as i want to wander from the house this time of year. Last night 9:30 or so, snowing and gross, light from the shed, the open kitchen door behind me and our next door neighbours back porch light throwing the shadow across the shed. Shed bulb might be 40w, pretty low, the other two the same or not much bigger.



dave
 
Last edited:
Awesome shots Gentlemen :thumbup:
[MENTION=89559]davent[/MENTION]; I really like your backyard shot, there is a great atmosphere in the photo.
 
Here is a reject from this months challenge - one of the schools in my village.

I have done more post-editing than I normally care for. I really like to keep it as "classic" as possible and do as much framing, lighting etc. in the camera as possible, so it may only be a little light or colour adjustment I do.

But for this one to turn out the way I would like it to, I adjusted the lights of the big tree in the left upper corner so it showed more, it was almost blacked out. The same go for the two upper corners of the building. I adjusted the light so it was as close to the rest of the building as possible, so I got a clear edge/frame of the brickwork.
As I stood under a street-light on the opposite side of the street, I turned down the light of the small tile-wall and hedge, because they were too dominant and drew attention away from the building.
I have straightened/levelled out the building as it has a slight tilt, and finally I turned up the sharpness in an effort to get a better show of the bricks in the building.
I feel a bit like an imposter having done so much editing compared to the original photo - but I comfort myself by saying it is still much less than in an average fashion magazine :tongue_sm

proxy.php
 

cleanshaved

I’m stumped
No tripod but had a crack at a night shot anyway. The house all lit up was screaming, take my photo.
I tried resting the lens on the fence but there is still too much movement.
Anyway here's my 1st attempt at a night shot.


View attachment 711025
 
Top Bottom