There were quite some posts on Da Vinci brushes lately but it seemed they did not get as much traction because there were some questions regarding their knot/loft ratio that seemed not to make them very suitable for face lathering. As Da Vinci is a famous manufacturer of artist and make up brushes I thought I give them a try and I got myself a Da Vinci 293 and I thought I let you know my impressions vs. comparable Thaeter and shavemac 3 band brushes. Here are the contestants: All 3 band Silvertip brushes (these are caliper measurements):
shavemac 25 series: 25mm/52mm
Thaeter 49125/1: 26mm/50mm
Da Vinci 293: 23mm/52mm
Craftmanship: All brushes are well made and did only shed an occasional hair. Made in Germany - enough sad
Softness: Thaeter rules, if even only by a notch - I have yet to find/use a 3 band that is as consistently soft as Thaeter. However, the difference to the Da Vinci and shavemac (regular silvertip) is only subtle; all three feel great on the face.
Density: Thaeter, Da Vinci, shavemac; this is not a D01 silvertip. Flow through is great on all three, probably a notch better on the shavemac
Backbone: Thaeter, Da Vinci, shavemac: shortest loft and biggest knot and pronounced bulb shape - what more to say: Thaeter is ahead, though only a bit over the Da Vinci
Lather: all make great lather with creams, soaps alike
So what about the loft of the Da Vinci - too high to be a good face latherer? Despite the largest loft/knot ratio (52/23mm) the Da Vinci did not come across as floppy. Actually, it has nice backbone and the knot is kind of a bulb/fan hybrid.
For me the Da Vinci faired well in this comparison to its better known German cousins. It is a good face latherer, soft, with backbone and good flow through. If you like larger knots, then you may have to go for the 290 with a 25mm knot that I have not tried yet.
In the top view below the Da Vinci is on top, Thaeter on the left and shavemac to the right...
shavemac 25 series: 25mm/52mm
Thaeter 49125/1: 26mm/50mm
Da Vinci 293: 23mm/52mm
Craftmanship: All brushes are well made and did only shed an occasional hair. Made in Germany - enough sad
Softness: Thaeter rules, if even only by a notch - I have yet to find/use a 3 band that is as consistently soft as Thaeter. However, the difference to the Da Vinci and shavemac (regular silvertip) is only subtle; all three feel great on the face.
Density: Thaeter, Da Vinci, shavemac; this is not a D01 silvertip. Flow through is great on all three, probably a notch better on the shavemac
Backbone: Thaeter, Da Vinci, shavemac: shortest loft and biggest knot and pronounced bulb shape - what more to say: Thaeter is ahead, though only a bit over the Da Vinci
Lather: all make great lather with creams, soaps alike
So what about the loft of the Da Vinci - too high to be a good face latherer? Despite the largest loft/knot ratio (52/23mm) the Da Vinci did not come across as floppy. Actually, it has nice backbone and the knot is kind of a bulb/fan hybrid.
For me the Da Vinci faired well in this comparison to its better known German cousins. It is a good face latherer, soft, with backbone and good flow through. If you like larger knots, then you may have to go for the 290 with a 25mm knot that I have not tried yet.
In the top view below the Da Vinci is on top, Thaeter on the left and shavemac to the right...