Over the past couple of months I've acquired these three coticules (numbered in the order I got them)...
When I got no 1 I did a small Wade & Butcher razor on it using a slurry dilution approach, though not strictly following any published dilucot instructions. And I got a pretty decent edge - not the sharpest I've had, but very smooth.
And I had another couple of tries with 1 and 2, adding a unicot ending - and that got me my best result.
I then read up on dilucot proper, and also decided I needed a slightly bigger stone because I find early work that needs any pressure quite tricky on a narrow stone (and any excuse will do, eh?) - the two small ones are approx 175x40mm.
So I got no 3, 200x60mm, from Eden Web Shops, and followed the dilucot instructions at coticlue.be on the same W&B razor - excluding the bevel-setting stage, as it was already set.
Big fail! I'd have had more chance of shaving with the stone itself than the razor. Never mind tree-topping hairs, if I held a few leg hairs taut the razor simply wouldn't cut them - it just bounced off. I tried a sharpie test in case there was actually something wrong with the bevel, but a couple of gentle passes on the stone with just water cleared all the ink.
I went back to the start and tried again, and the result was the same - a really dull edge.
For my next attempt a couple of days later, I went back to coticule no 1 as I know I'd had a reasonable result from that. After following the coticule.be dilucot instructions again, I had an edge that would tree-top hairs a bit but not very well. Better than my stone no 3 results, but not as good as my original stone no 1 result.
It seems my ad-hoc banging around got me better results than following the proper instructions. The trouble is, it's not easily reproducible - and I found the coticule experience a bit frustrating as there's no feedback to tell you when each dilution is done (unlike with synthetics where I can feel when it's time to move on).
What I did notice is that both stones feel equally hard, and no 1 seems faster than no 3 - the slurry darkened with swarf more quickly. So maybe with no 3 I just need more strokes at each dilution - but I'd be running out of slurry in the early stages.
And maybe I need more laps on no 1 too - or maybe I did too many when following the proper instructions and actually need fewer? At the moment, it seems to me as if I need to be just making random changes to my technique and hoping I'll hit on something good.
So, any suggestions how I should proceed? I know you can't tell me what to do with my specific stones, but just suggestions for directions would be welcome.
(I should add that a kind person here in the UK has offered to check my coticule edge and then put on a Veinette edge of his own for me, but I already know what my current edge is like - a bit dull)
When I got no 1 I did a small Wade & Butcher razor on it using a slurry dilution approach, though not strictly following any published dilucot instructions. And I got a pretty decent edge - not the sharpest I've had, but very smooth.
And I had another couple of tries with 1 and 2, adding a unicot ending - and that got me my best result.
I then read up on dilucot proper, and also decided I needed a slightly bigger stone because I find early work that needs any pressure quite tricky on a narrow stone (and any excuse will do, eh?) - the two small ones are approx 175x40mm.
So I got no 3, 200x60mm, from Eden Web Shops, and followed the dilucot instructions at coticlue.be on the same W&B razor - excluding the bevel-setting stage, as it was already set.
Big fail! I'd have had more chance of shaving with the stone itself than the razor. Never mind tree-topping hairs, if I held a few leg hairs taut the razor simply wouldn't cut them - it just bounced off. I tried a sharpie test in case there was actually something wrong with the bevel, but a couple of gentle passes on the stone with just water cleared all the ink.
I went back to the start and tried again, and the result was the same - a really dull edge.
For my next attempt a couple of days later, I went back to coticule no 1 as I know I'd had a reasonable result from that. After following the coticule.be dilucot instructions again, I had an edge that would tree-top hairs a bit but not very well. Better than my stone no 3 results, but not as good as my original stone no 1 result.
It seems my ad-hoc banging around got me better results than following the proper instructions. The trouble is, it's not easily reproducible - and I found the coticule experience a bit frustrating as there's no feedback to tell you when each dilution is done (unlike with synthetics where I can feel when it's time to move on).
What I did notice is that both stones feel equally hard, and no 1 seems faster than no 3 - the slurry darkened with swarf more quickly. So maybe with no 3 I just need more strokes at each dilution - but I'd be running out of slurry in the early stages.
And maybe I need more laps on no 1 too - or maybe I did too many when following the proper instructions and actually need fewer? At the moment, it seems to me as if I need to be just making random changes to my technique and hoping I'll hit on something good.
So, any suggestions how I should proceed? I know you can't tell me what to do with my specific stones, but just suggestions for directions would be welcome.
(I should add that a kind person here in the UK has offered to check my coticule edge and then put on a Veinette edge of his own for me, but I already know what my current edge is like - a bit dull)