You are correct that the order of strengths is eau de parfum, eau de toilette, then eau de cologne as the weakest. The strongest one of all, parfum, you did not mention. The French, I believe, set the concentration standards for these many generations ago, but I don't know if the standards are enforced round the world.I've bought EDP'S, EDT'S, AND EDC'S. EDP'S are obviously supposed to be the most powerful and for me, none of these last particularly long. A few hours and than you have to reapply. Has anyone tried SOLID COLOGNES? If so, how do they compare to liquid alcohol based edt's and edp's?
Thank you for an excellent post.You are correct that the order of strengths is eau de parfum, eau de toilette, then eau de cologne as the weakest. The strongest one of all, parfum, you did not mention. The French, I believe, set the concentration standards for these many generations ago, but I don't know if the standards are enforced round the world.
Strength translates somewhat into longevity. But it's not the primary reason for the different strengths.
Eau de colognes, eau de toilettes and eau de parfums will each of them last all day, and are intended to do so, but not on the body! The body will absorb, perspire, and neutralise any scent over time. Despite the age-old advice to put the scent on pulse points, the only way most fragrances truly last all day is to put them on clothing. Women have known this for ages. Just ask the wife. Women have been putting perfume on their clothing, hankys, scarves, etc. since before the French Revolution.
Most men, however, are reluctant to do so. Certainly, it has its drawbacks and limitations. Some brands and formulations can stain clothing. A scent, once applied, will remain until laundered off. Hence, handkerchiefs have been the most popular choice, as they are easily changed. On the plus side, a scent applied to cloth will always present its original scent profile. A scent applied to the body will be tainted by the body's own chemistry, and morph somewhat over time as it fades.
The difference in strengths pertaining to eau de cologne-toilette-parfum is the concentration of the essential oils, with the consequent increase in strength and cost, which to-day is not so much about longevity as the amount need to be applied to achieve the desired level of fragrance. Parfum comes in tiny bottles not merely because of its high cost but mainly because so little is expected to be used each time it is applied. Women who don't understand this invariably put too much on. Of course in olden times, people bathed much less and strong fragrances were fashionable amongst the wealthy. Perfume-strength fragrances are largely irrelevant to-day except when used very sparingly.
I don't believe solid cologne offers any greater longevity than a liquid one. It's just a different medium in which the essential oils are suspended.
The alcohol base also plays no role in longevity. It evaporates almost immediately upon application, leaving behind the fragrant components of the scent.
Of course, one's nose also becomes indifferent to a fragrance and perceives it to have faded more quickly than it really has.
Anyone have any experience with these fragrance primers?You might try using a scentless moisturizer before perfume application or a fragrance primer like Linger or Canvas & Concrete.
Anyone have any experience with these fragrance primers?
Ditto!Thank you for an excellent post.
I’ve tried going that route, only to confirm your finding. It’s better to put your cologne on after you’re dressed.Anyone have any experience with these fragrance primers?
My understanding is the brain once it identifies a scent as a non threat stashes/stores/ignores it to free up the resources to identify those scents that might represent a threat.
dave
My brain doesn't seem to recognise the threat posed by colognes...to my wallet!My understanding is the brain once it identifies a scent as a non threat stashes/stores/ignores it to free up the resources to identify those scents that might represent a threat.
dave
I've bought EDP'S, EDT'S, AND EDC'S. EDP'S are obviously supposed to be the most powerful and for me, none of these last particularly long. A few hours and than you have to reapply. Has anyone tried SOLID COLOGNES? If so, how do they compare to liquid alcohol based edt's and edp's?
Wonderful post.You are correct that the order of strengths is eau de parfum, eau de toilette, then eau de cologne as the weakest. The strongest one of all, parfum, you did not mention. The French, I believe, set the concentration standards for these many generations ago, but I don't know if the standards are enforced round the world.
Strength translates somewhat into longevity. But it's not the primary reason for the different strengths.
Eau de colognes, eau de toilettes and eau de parfums will each of them last all day, and are intended to do so, but not on the body! The body will absorb, perspire, and neutralise any scent over time. Despite the age-old advice to put the scent on pulse points, the only way most fragrances truly last all day is to put them on clothing. Women have known this for ages. Just ask the wife. Women have been putting perfume on their clothing, hankys, scarves, etc. since before the French Revolution.
Most men, however, are reluctant to do so. Certainly, it has its drawbacks and limitations. Some brands and formulations can stain clothing. A scent, once applied, will remain until laundered off. Hence, handkerchiefs have been the most popular choice, as they are easily changed. On the plus side, a scent applied to cloth will always present its original scent profile. A scent applied to the body will be tainted by the body's own chemistry, and morph somewhat over time as it fades.
The difference in strengths pertaining to eau de cologne-toilette-parfum is the concentration of the essential oils, with the consequent increase in strength and cost, which to-day is not so much about longevity as the amount need to be applied to achieve the desired level of fragrance. Parfum comes in tiny bottles not merely because of its high cost but mainly because so little is expected to be used each time it is applied. Women who don't understand this invariably put too much on. Of course in olden times, people bathed much less and strong fragrances were fashionable amongst the wealthy. Perfume-strength fragrances are largely irrelevant to-day except when used very sparingly.
I don't believe solid cologne offers any greater longevity than a liquid one. It's just a different medium in which the essential oils are suspended.
The alcohol base also plays no role in longevity. It evaporates almost immediately upon application, leaving behind the fragrant components of the scent.
Of course, one's nose also becomes indifferent to a fragrance and perceives it to have faded more quickly than it really has.
from my experience, fragrances from shaving houses usually dont last that long with a few exceptions im sure. i haven't tried them all. if u want a fragrance to last long, go to a fragrance house. also trying them is a good idea as its a little different on everyone.
some houses let you purchase samples online, like maison francis kurkdjian
i used a bunch of ADP fragrances, wonderful smells, but it barely lasts half the day.
I've bought EDP'S, EDT'S, AND EDC'S. EDP'S are obviously supposed to be the most powerful and for me, none of these last particularly long. A few hours and than you have to reapply. Has anyone tried SOLID COLOGNES? If so, how do they compare to liquid alcohol based edt's and edp's?
No doubt. Especially Interlude Man, a.k.a. Blue Beast. That one lasts 2 days on me. I'm not kidding.