Chinese-made, seller claims they are very dense.
On eBay: E.g., http://www.ebay.com/itm/300755395933?_trksid=p5197.c0.m619
Well-reviewed on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Premium-Silvertip-Badger-Shaving-Products/dp/B0085IBU12/ref=cm_cr_pr_pb_t
In reply to questions I emailed "Lee," the proprietor, he wrote me:
Well, it's going to be impossible to have the same handle as Simpsons does at my price point, so no, I'm not going to say my resin handle is equal to Simpsons. Theirs is hand turned on a lathe made out of resin-acrylic. WSP handles are injection molded out of regular resin. The brushes weigh the same and feel similar though. I think the Stubby actually weighs more than the Chubby.
The chubby has more hair density, the Persian Jar has less. The Tulip 2 is about the same, or a little less.
In terms of softness, I would say yes, they are extremely similar.
In terms of performance, Simpsons has different effective lofts than my brushes. The effective loft of the regular Stubby is only about 40mm, and the extra firm is even shorter. So, they're scrubbier. At least for this generation of brushes.
So, that's my thorough answer. The knots are going to be similar, but not the same. They're both hand made using the same or similar grades of silvertip badger hair. The handles are different, Simpsons has much more labor put into theirs.
The brushes are made in China.
I would recommend the regular version. The extra firm is extra scrubby and is a huge lather hog. It is not for everyone. It does eat up soap pretty good though.
On eBay: E.g., http://www.ebay.com/itm/300755395933?_trksid=p5197.c0.m619
Well-reviewed on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Premium-Silvertip-Badger-Shaving-Products/dp/B0085IBU12/ref=cm_cr_pr_pb_t
In reply to questions I emailed "Lee," the proprietor, he wrote me:
Well, it's going to be impossible to have the same handle as Simpsons does at my price point, so no, I'm not going to say my resin handle is equal to Simpsons. Theirs is hand turned on a lathe made out of resin-acrylic. WSP handles are injection molded out of regular resin. The brushes weigh the same and feel similar though. I think the Stubby actually weighs more than the Chubby.
The chubby has more hair density, the Persian Jar has less. The Tulip 2 is about the same, or a little less.
In terms of softness, I would say yes, they are extremely similar.
In terms of performance, Simpsons has different effective lofts than my brushes. The effective loft of the regular Stubby is only about 40mm, and the extra firm is even shorter. So, they're scrubbier. At least for this generation of brushes.
So, that's my thorough answer. The knots are going to be similar, but not the same. They're both hand made using the same or similar grades of silvertip badger hair. The handles are different, Simpsons has much more labor put into theirs.
The brushes are made in China.
I would recommend the regular version. The extra firm is extra scrubby and is a huge lather hog. It is not for everyone. It does eat up soap pretty good though.