Well, then I will do it. I think it's a sign of bad taste to use the death of over a hundred people to score a point against a company one doesn't like.
Well, then I will do it. I think it's a sign of bad taste to use the death of over a hundred people to score a point against a company one doesn't like.
I didn't do that
The title you chose for your thread and the wording of said posting gave the impression. If I understood it wrong, I apologize.
+1the title you chose for your thread and the wording of said posting gave the impression. If i understood it wrong, i apologize.
+1i beg you folks not to jump to conclusions. Let the pros do their jobs.
It was Libyan airlines, that's the issue, not the manufacturer.
The only reason you hear about Airbus planes crashing more often, and I don't even know if that's statistically true, is because Airbus planes are more popular among the airlines of developing countries, where air travel safety standards are vastly less stringent than they are in North America or Europe.
LAN in Chile, TAM in Brazil, EgyptAir, South African Airways, and lots of others, their fleets are dominated by Airbus aircraft.
Boeing aircraft are dominant in places like the US, Canada, Japan, Australia, etc. places with excellent air safety.
The reality is that large commercial air accidents are very, very, very rarely due to some kind of inherenty design flaw - 99/100 it is pilot error or faulty maintenance.