Pretty sure it's because that particular set was carried by John Holak during WWII.
Yes, i saw that too......I don´t know it. I´ve this information from the Krumholz book page 270
I don´t know it. I´ve this information from the Krumholz book page 270
Porter, they look the same
Mass-produced items do tend to do that. I've got one of these exact same sets myself. It definitely wasn't John Holak's though.
So what makes it a J Holack set? It doesn't seem to have a signature or any lettering.
I did :Read the bit out of Krumholz's book that I quoted above again. Either Achim's got his set mislabeled or he acquired John's set. Some googling I did earlier seemed to suggest that John may have passed in the early 2000s, so I suppose either is possible.
I did :
Tech was issued in the little leatherette-covered metal "pocket edition" type of box that had become a staple for lower priced Gillette razor sets. The cap is cast non-ferrous metal, the head is plated steel, and the handle is a Bakelite material
so all of these 1942 type Techs were the John set?
NO. Read the whole thing. The set that was pictured in Krumholz's book belonged to a guy named John Holak. That set, and only that exact would be John Holak's razor set.
OH, i see, i thought it all series of sets was named after Holak since he was a collector....So why would MR razor have his mis-labeled since they look similar?
Maybe Ahim may chime in, i know he is in Germany in different time zones. ( 445 am at this time)Or he might actually have John's set there. It sounds like he may have just misunderstood Krumholz's captioning of that photo, though.
I´ve misunderstood it. I´ve changed the information on my site now.Or he might actually have John's set there. It sounds like he may have just misunderstood Krumholz's captioning of that photo, though.