@OkieStubble , it's not a joke. When you get your 1911, you should dress it up with these:
1911 Mammoth Ivory Grips
1911 Mammoth Ivory Grips
@OkieStubble , it's not a joke. When you get your 1911, you should dress it up with these:
1911 Mammoth Ivory Grips
Personal opinion here . . . I keep my home defense guns with a round chambered, period. Pick it up and shoot. Especially for the LOTH, who has less experience than I. Nothing to remember, nothing to do except protect yourself.
Also, my LOTH has weak (arthritic) hands, but can rack the slide on the PPQ if necessary (malfs) because she does it this way. This may not apply to you, so forgive if it doesn't, but some of us of the male persuasion tend to do the slingshot rack, not even thinking that it is considerably harder than the technique above.
Otherwise, please carry on, I'm enjoying all the revolver talk.
A 4" 357 Magnum, would I believe, be the perfect revolver. My les Baer UTC, is kept loaded in my side stand. It is the wife, and I, and our daughter, who is 21. I live in the boonies, my 243, has a much better chance of being used, on livestock raiders.
I have a buddy who lives out in the sticks and he has a bunch of Guinea's that roost on top of his house at night and sound off at the slightest noise or movement. He also keeps a flock of Geese in his front yard and they are more vicious than many of dogs I have seen.
Every time I go out to his house, they immediately try to attack me in mass numbers the minute I step out of my car.
He also keeps a flock of Geese in his front yard and they are more vicious than many of dogs I have seen.
Every time I go out to his house, they immediately try to attack me in mass numbers the minute I step out of my car.
He can buy another Glock or two for the price of those grips. That's what I'd bet happens. I especially like that first set with the green bark.@OkieStubble , it's not a joke. When you get your 1911, you should dress it up with these:
1911 Mammoth Ivory Grips
Did I just defend Glock? That felt weird.
.
Also, my LOTH has weak (arthritic) hands, but can rack the slide on the PPQ if necessary (malfs) because she does it this way.
There are about half dozen Canadian geese that are here from time to time, but they aren't domesticated so they are not good guards...they just take care of where they are at the time.
If the coyotes weren't so bad here I'd get some little ones so they could establish territory here.
I don't know how the mailman would like it though...when he has to come up to the house.
You are banned to the world of plastic...for life.
Pictures of Colt Pythons please. I love revolvers.
The only disadvantage of a revolver is the limited ammo capacity. For home defense and range shooting, a ,357 magnum revolver with a 4" barrel is ideal. The 0.357 magnum has one of the best "one shot stop" track records, especially if you get ammo specifically designed for home defense. Thus, unless your home is attacked by a horde of Zombies, you should not need to reload. With a 4" barrel, accuracy is excellent and there is sufficient weight to tame the recoil from the magnum round. Shorter barrels work fine with 0.38 Special, but are difficult to shoot accurately with magnum loads, especially on follow-up shots.
For range shooting, you can purchase the less expensive 0.38 Special rounds. They have very little recoil in a 4" revolver, so they are fun to shoot.
When I took my wife to the range, she had a lot of trouble racking the slide on a 9mm polymer pistol, but had no trouble shooting a Ruger GP100 Match Champion with either 0.357 Magnum or 0.38 Special rounds. Although she preferred single action mode (cocking the hammer manually), she had sufficient hand strength to fire double action as well.
The S&W 686 is also a nice revolver; but I like the Ruger better. If you can compare both at the range, see which you like best.
.357Magnum?? NOT FOR A **FIRST GUN**!! There are some folks who can say nothing, on any gun forum, unless they suggest a .357Magnum for a FIRST gun.
My question is this: "If the little lady has problems with hand strength for a semi-automatic pistol, will she have the hand strength for the double-action pull poundage of a revolver?" Also, I agree that exposed hammers complete the symmetry of a revolver. HOWEVER, revolver self-defense folks have, and still do, advocate the double-action trigger pull vs. pulling the hammer back in a single-action method.
The OP mentioned liking 3-inch barreled revolvers. Might I suggest a Smith and Wesson 'original design' Bodyguard-638 series. There is a trigger stump and I have seen them fitted with 2 1/2 inch barrels. It is not the wieght of a 'service revolver', but with most standard-pressure ammunition (another thing to consider with weak hands - recoil shock ) this is a fine piece.
.357Magnum?? NOT FOR A **FIRST GUN**!! There are some folks who can say nothing, on any gun forum, unless they suggest a .357Magnum for a FIRST gun.
My question is this: "If the little lady has problems with hand strength for a semi-automatic pistol, will she have the hand strength for the double-action pull poundage of a revolver?" Also, I agree that exposed hammers complete the symmetry of a revolver. HOWEVER, revolver self-defense folks have, and still do, advocate the double-action trigger pull vs. pulling the hammer back in a single-action method.
The OP mentioned liking 3-inch barreled revolvers. Might I suggest a Smith and Wesson 'original design' Bodyguard-638 series. There is a trigger stump and I have seen them fitted with 2 1/2 inch barrels. It is not the wieght of a 'service revolver', but with most standard-pressure ammunition (another thing to consider with weak hands - recoil shock ) this is a fine piece.
I do like snubbies, but it looks like we are going to have to agree to disagree. In my humble opinion a lightweight snubby is just about the worst revolver for a newbie.
1. The short sight radius on a 2-2 1/2 inch barrel makes getting hits that much harder for a newbie than even a 4 inch barrel, which can be frustrating for a newbie.
2. You take the same load, fire it out of a 14 ounce snubby then fire the same load in a K or L frame and the full sized revolver will have much less felt recoil. And the extra weight of the full sized revolver will help it "hang" better when shooting offhand.
3. Due to the simple mechanicals of the snubby being smaller all around, the shorter internals do not give the leverage of a full sized wheelgun and the snubby will actually have a heavier trigger pull.
I think a full sized .357 with a 4" barrel is about the perfect wheelgun for a newb. You can load everything from light target .38s to standard pressure .38s to .38 +P to full house magnums in it. Just use the loads the shooter is comfortable with.
Just my O2s worth...someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Yall are much more experienced with revolvers than I am, but I would like to add, I have shot full sized revolvers and lightweight snubbies, am I the only one who thinks the triggers on the full sized frames, seem to be much smoother and lighter than ones on smaller frame snubbies?