Anyone have a P224? I'm considering getting one.
I currently have the P320 compact 9mm which is a little large for carry. I'm currently looking at the P938 Equinox or Limited in 9mm or .40, how much smaller is it compared to Sigs compact? Hoping to find something smaller than the 320 compact but larger than pocket size.
I currently have the P320 compact 9mm which is a little large for carry. I'm currently looking at the P938 Equinox or Limited in 9mm or .40, how much smaller is it compared to Sigs compact? Hoping to find something smaller than the 320 compact but larger than pocket size.
Thanks for the clarification...prefer the P938 SAS or Equinox model. I just need to figure out whether I prefer to carry only in the car or on my person too and where. I would prefer a double/single action but the 938 has a safety so it may not be an issue. Also looking at the Ruger SR9c and Walther PPK but its a .380 .
Have any P938 owners heard about this slick little modification which gives the 938 2 extra rounds?
http://sigtalk.com/gun-projects/31280-how-modify-p290-mags-use-p938.html
I prefer DA/SA as well, but the 1911 mechanism is fine in my opinion if it's got a good stiff safety on it and you keep the trigger and safety protected. The firing pin in the 938 is held back by a little fork that's engaged by the first bit of travel on the trigger, and the safety blocks the trigger and the hammer. I'm used to carrying DA/SA guns all my life (with safety on), so for me it's just part of muscle memory to go for the safety on the draw. My thumb just naturally goes for it even on guns that don't have a safety
The 938 (or any of the pocket 9mm) could probably fill both roles, particularly if your on-body carry system is something you can take on and off easily (like a clip on IWB or OWB holster, pocket carry, waist pouch/bag holster). Agree on the 380. If it's all you can carry, it's better than nothing, but it is a bit marginal, particularly with regard to getting the right balance of expansion and penetration with defense ammo given the low amount of available energy. That's why all of the single stack pocket 9mm have come out, giving you a duty caliber in a small size. That said, I have carried 380 on occasion (Smith SW380) when I just couldn't carry anything else. I'm hoping my 938 can fill that summertime roll as well with pocket carry.
The SR9c is a near full size gun - a bit tough to carry, but if that's just for the car could be good for that. That is another way to think of the problem, actually. Get something inexpensive (but full size) for the car - something you wouldn't cry over if stolen, then some thing small for on-body carry. The theft factor can be reduced with the use of a car gun safe.
Great info...thanks! Looking thru Sig's current catalog and found a 1911 Ultra. More expensive and a fraction larger than the 938 but may be an option. Would have to see them next to each other to compare.
http://sigsauer.com/CatalogProductDetails/1911-ultra-two-tone.aspx
You bet. Indeed, that's a sweet firearm. After carrying around this 938 this week, I can see the attraction of the 1911 format in general, with its relatively narrow frame. Indeed if I was going to carry .45 very consistently, I think I'd lean toward a 1911 style gun over my double stack P250. Good luck in your search.
Do you have the compact or subcompact 250? I have the P320 compact and wondering if I can downsize the grip module to subcompact?
Thanks for the clarification...prefer the P938 SAS or Equinox model. I just need to figure out whether I prefer to carry only in the car or on my person too and where. I would prefer a double/single action but the 938 has a safety so it may not be an issue. Also looking at the Ruger SR9c and Walther PPK but its a .380 .
I have the Subcompact 250. I'm not sure on compatibility between the compact/fullsize slides and trigger assembly and the subcompact grip. I seem to recall there is an issue there. I'll dig around a bit, as I'm not totally sure.
If you aren't used to it, it could take a while to get into your comfort zone with it though. I carry in condition 1 only, and only pistols in the same battery of arms, though a thumb sweep of a non-existent safety is less of a factor than the reverse scenario. I just like to keep all of them consistent with each other unless it is strictly a range gun. Personal preference.
Thanks...I've read that it's best to have guns with the same characteristics. Good idea about practicing the thumb sweep on non-existent safety. I would probably carry the 938 without a bullet in the tube and use the slide to chamber a bullet and **** the hammer. Is this advisable?
In 1911 circles, that is what is referred to as "condition 3", with the conditions of readiness being 1, 2, or 3 (apologies if you were already aware). I personally wouldn't do it, because I am operating under the assumption that in a scenario where I would have to draw my pistol, I would either, a. need it ready to fire as soon as it came out, or b. not want the sound of the slide being racked to give away the fact that I had a gun.
The only issue that I have with carrying the 938 in condition 1 is that it lacks the additional 2nd safety on the grip of the 1911. I always double check the thumb safety on the Sig for this reason.
It really comes down to what you are comfortable with. In condition 3, the pistol is virtually a bludgeon until some very specific actions are taken to make it ready to fire. If you practice with it that way though, you can minimize that lag time. It is virtually impossible for you to experience a negligent discharge in this condition though.