there have been a couple of times when i was glad i was sniped , saved me from myself
+100
there have been a couple of times when i was glad i was sniped , saved me from myself
I don't know why, but I don't like the idea of sniping... I've won a lot of auctions without resorting to sniping.
I have decided that sniping is theft.
By preventing further good-faith bidding it robs the seller of the real market value of their item.
It's not a real auction when sniping is used.
I have decided that sniping is theft.
By preventing further good-faith bidding it robs the seller of the real market value of their item.
It's not a real auction when sniping is used.
Can you elaborate? Neither as a seller or a buyer, do I have a gripe with sniping. As I seller, I benefit from emotionally-driven bidding, but if a sniper wins and auction, it's because they've offered the highest bid. Usually that's a calculated fair market price.
The bottom line on e-bay is...
The guy who wants it most, and thus is willing to spend the money required to get it, will get it.
It's great when you are able to sneak in an under the wire low ball bid and walk off with a tasty piece for a low price, but the business is all about selling to the highest bidder.
If you want it, bid at a sufficient level to ensure you get it, if you hope to slip under the wire, good luck and best of intentions, but don't complain when your outbid. That's the whole IDEA of e-bay.
But sniping software can get that last snipe in too late for a counter, even from Ebay's "Max Bid" software. There is always a little lag, and I have seen it happen.
ETA:
Some auction sites automatically extend the auction some small amount of time with each bid. That keeps the auction honest.
Snipers just get mad at people who bid their max early. Why? Sniper loses.
This is enough to show that bidding once early is better than sniping.
Sniping is a good way to get a rush if your are ultra-competitive though.
I don't know why, but I don't like the idea of sniping... I've won a lot of auctions without resorting to sniping.
I have decided that sniping is theft.
By preventing further good-faith bidding it robs the seller of the real market value of their item.
It's not a real auction when sniping is used.
And yes, snipes can be so close to last second bids that even the Ebay progressive bid engine doesn't have time to counter. Someone can actually have a higher "maximum bid" set and still lose to a sniper that gets the bid in with a half-second until close of auction.
But their "highest bid" is offered *purposely* so late in the auction that bona-fide buyers do not have opportunity to counter-bid. Thus, there is someone out there that is willing to bid higher but did not have opportunity because the sniper purposely used software to get an unfair advantage.
Real auctions do not have times that they end regardless of buyers willing to make further bids. Sniping relies on waiting until no one can counter to make a bid; hence is unfair and is theft.
No they can't, earlier bids get priorty. It's built into the system to favour earlier higher bids. Sniping is fair because the highest bidder still wins, whether it's someone who bid a day before, or another sniper.But their "highest bid" is offered *purposely* so late in the auction that bona-fide buyers do not have opportunity to counter-bid. Thus, there is someone out there that is willing to bid higher but did not have opportunity because the sniper purposely used software to get an unfair advantage.
Real auctions do not have times that they end regardless of buyers willing to make further bids. Sniping relies on waiting until no one can counter to make a bid; hence is unfair and is theft.
And yes, snipes can be so close to last second bids that even the Ebay progressive bid engine doesn't have time to counter. Someone can actually have a higher "maximum bid" set and still lose to a sniper that gets the bid in with a half-second until close of auction.