I guess I am more intelligent than you because I couldn't be arsed to even try it.I consider myself an intelligent person and I think I got 3 sides once in the 80’s. I just cant do the stupid thing.
Nope. I haven’t touched one since high school.I guess I am more intelligent than you because I couldn't be arsed to even try it.
Or is that proof that I'm a dummy?
I couldn't even get that far!I consider myself an intelligent person and I think I got 3 sides once in the 80’s. I just cant do the stupid thing.
I do. I speed solve competitively
I do. I speed solve competitively
My official record is 22.2 seconds and I have an unofficial (not during tournament) personal best of 19.76 seconds.
Well there are different ways to solve it. Roux and CFOP are the methods I prefer.I think it took me longer than that to get it out of the retail package.
I've never solved one, but I did have a moment of clarity once. I'm convinced that you have to solve 3 sides at the same time. Maybe that's completely wrong, or I'm not describing it properly, but that's as far as I got with it before I moved. That's been a few years ago and I have no idea what happened to it
I can teach you, if you like.I think it took me longer than that to get it out of the retail package.
I've never solved one, but I did have a moment of clarity once. I'm convinced that you have to solve 3 sides at the same time. Maybe that's completely wrong, or I'm not describing it properly, but that's as far as I got with it before I moved. That's been a few years ago and I have no idea what happened to it. I'd like to take a serious attempt at it again...
I seem to recall reading that it is solvable simply by making a series of rote moves, regardless of the "scramble". The only determining factor of said scramble is how many "moves you need to make before completion. I have no clue whether this is true or not.