Masculine old lady.....you mean Tabac?
I remember Joe explaining "XXX" back when IB rolled out the new line. He wanted a name that would signify "generic". The story of the porduct name involved the generic golf balls used as a youth, not a film rating. That I can get, but the MF named soap is bad taste IMHO.
Agreed completely. No worse than the movie, and you hear/see far worse on television at any and all hours of the day.
It's just a name, you can always remove the label and put your own on if it's that distressing to read. Missing out on a great soap because of something so trivial seems absurd to me.
(my initial reaction was, really, IB is calling a soap that? What are they thinking about?).
I think you should follow that initial reaction a little further. What is the RazoRock brand trying to accomplish? I don't think RazoRock is trying to market to 8-year old boys, the pope, or even grandparents for that matter. My guess is RazoRock is trying to make wet shaving a little more hip and accessible. Perhaps roughly equivalent to the Axe demographic.
I think you should follow that initial reaction a little further. What is the RazoRock brand trying to accomplish? I don't think RazoRock is trying to market to 8-year old boys, the pope, or even grandparents for that matter. My guess is RazoRock is trying to make wet shaving a little more hip and accessible. Perhaps roughly equivalent to the Axe demographic.
Didn't think the movie mentioned above was particularly in good taste. Nor is the fact that far worse is on television or the Internet a justification to do something less invasive. I think it would be embarrassing to have to explain the humor of the name to an 8 year old boy or girl, for example. And it is not that the name of the soap is overly distressing in and by itself; my panties are not in a knot because someone calls a soap Mudder Focker (my initial reaction was, really, IB is calling a soap that? What are they thinking about?). Nor is it trivial. It's just stupid, both intellectually and culturally. It's one more thing that isn't cute, clever or in good taste in an environment/culture that has an abundance of bad taste . Nor is it clever marketing. Its as culturally sensitive as the 5 year old male rapper doing his thing in front of gyrating adult females while he ejects water from a water gun held at his crotch. That important video was on You Tube the last couple of days. Very culturally inspiring. Admittedly the MF name on soap is a little thing but you get the point. But no one would want you to miss out on a great soap. I wonder if his Holiness Benedict XVI uses it? He shaves. IB should send him a complimentary jar. Wonder if he would think it edgy, amusing or clever marketing. Am I being too snarky? I'm sorry.
Nor is it trivial.
Admittedly the MF name on soap is a little thing
I think it is clear from the majority of the posts on this forum, RR soaps are a quality product, and thus sell quite well amongst the wet shaving community. The name adds zero to the performance of the soap, in fact, if most are being honest, what is the first question most of us ask when a soap carries a name that like many of the RR products- "OK, but what does it smell like?" Mudder Focker, 888, King Louis, XXX, etc leave potential buyers scratching their collective heads. I would agree Mudder Focker is a name in poor taste, but I admit the name gets my attention, albeit for the wrong reason. I see no reason to try to be "hip" with the marketing- just give potential buyers some much needed information about the product- particularly with a product line that doesn't offer sampling options.
Well, if that's the case, I think they will fail. The Axe demographic doesn't wetshave. Plus I don't understand how having a tasteless name is supposed to be cool. I agree with Zeppelinkarte that the best adjective for it is stupid.
Didn't think the movie mentioned above was particularly in good taste. Nor is the fact that far worse is on television or the Internet a justification to do something less invasive. I think it would be embarrassing to have to explain the humor of the name to an 8 year old boy or girl, for example. And it is not that the name of the soap is overly distressing in and by itself; my panties are not in a knot because someone calls a soap Mudder Focker (my initial reaction was, really, IB is calling a soap that? What are they thinking about?). Nor is it trivial. It's just stupid, both intellectually and culturally. It's one more thing that isn't cute, clever or in good taste in an environment/culture that has an abundance of bad taste . Nor is it clever marketing. Its as culturally sensitive as the 5 year old male rapper doing his thing in front of gyrating adult females while he ejects water from a water gun held at his crotch. That important video was on You Tube the last couple of days. Very culturally inspiring. Admittedly the MF name on soap is a little thing but you get the point. But no one would want you to miss out on a great soap. I wonder if his Holiness Benedict XVI uses it? He shaves. IB should send him a complimentary jar. Wonder if he would think it edgy, amusing or clever marketing. Am I being too snarky? I'm sorry.
Well, what if he were shaving and his 8-year-old child came into the room and saw the soap container on the counter? Or what if it was a 10-year-old or an 11-year-old who might recognize that the second word bears an uncanny resemblance to a word he/she might've heard at school in the hallway?These are all your opinions. How about this: If you don't like the name, don't buy the soap. Why would you need to explain the humor to an 8 year old? .....
Well, what if he were shaving and his 8-year-old child came into the room and saw the soap container on the counter? Or what if it was a 10-year-old or an 11-year-old who might recognize that the second word bears an uncanny resemblance to a word he/she might've heard at school in the hallway?